These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32880794)
1. Surgical outcome for robotic-assisted single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) in female-to male reassignment compared to its use in benign gynecological disease: a single center experience. Gardella B; Dominoni M; Bogliolo S; Spinillo A J Robot Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):579-584. PubMed ID: 32880794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases. Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study. Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which Is the Best Surgical Approach for Female-to-Male Sexual Reassignment? A Systematic Review of Hysterectomy and Salpingo-Oophorectomy Options from the Gynecological Perspective. Dominoni M; Gritti A; Pano MR; Sandullo L; Papa R; Torella M; Gardella B Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jul; 60(7):. PubMed ID: 39064524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes. Gardella B; Dominoni M; Gritti A; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Torella M; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Couso A; Zapico A; Zapardiel I Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jan; 59(1):. PubMed ID: 36676747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions' preliminary experience. Bogliolo S; Mereu L; Cassani C; Gardella B; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Babilonti L; Delpezzo C; Tateo S; Spinillo A Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 25231021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting. Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy Compared with Single-Port Access Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Noh JJ; Jeon JE; Jung JH; Kim TJ J Pers Med; 2023 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37511791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of perioperative complications and influencing factors of complications in 1 000 cases of robotic gynecological surgery]. Huang XT; Ji M; Zhao Z; He NN; Li Y; Xu PL; Zhang JF Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):341-348. PubMed ID: 34034421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of Vaginal Hysterectomy for Female-to-Male Transgender Men. Obedin-Maliver J; Light A; de Haan G; Jackson RA Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 129(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 28178042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Cosmetic Outcomes of the Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer. Corrado G; Calagna G; Cutillo G; Insinga S; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Zampa A; Bufalo A; Perino A; Vizza E Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jan; 28(1):194-199. PubMed ID: 29040189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic single-site surgery in benign gynecologic diseases: Experiences and learning curve based on 626 robotic cases at a single institute. Yoo HK; Cho A; Cho EH; Kim SJ; Shim JE; Lee SR; Jeong K; Moon HS J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1885-1892. PubMed ID: 32686302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]