These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32880895)

  • 1. Cesarean delivery after non-medically indicated induction of labor: A population-based study using different definitions of expectant management.
    Zenzmaier C; Pfeifer B; Leitner H; König-Bachmann M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 32880895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood of primary cesarean section following induction of labor in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term, compared with expectant management: An Australian population-based, historical cohort study.
    Hu Y; Homer CSE; Ellwood D; Slavin V; Vogel JP; Enticott J; Callander EJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 May; 103(5):946-954. PubMed ID: 38291953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
    Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
    Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
    Palatnik A; Kominiarek MA
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.
    Zhao Y; Flatley C; Kumar S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 57(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28251626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induction of labor or expectant management? Birth outcomes for nulliparous individuals choosing midwifery care.
    Erickson EN; Bailey JM; Colo SD; Carlson NS; Tilden EL
    Birth; 2021 Dec; 48(4):501-513. PubMed ID: 34047405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing expectant management and spontaneous labor approaches in studying the effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery.
    Danilack VA; Triche EW; Dore DD; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):405-411.e1. PubMed ID: 27211604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Grobman WA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
    Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
    Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labor and cesarean birth in lower-risk nulliparous women at term: A retrospective cohort study.
    Butler SE; Wallace EM; Bisits A; Selvaratnam RJ; Davey MA
    Birth; 2024 Sep; 51(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 38173333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Term labor induction compared with expectant management.
    Glantz JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 115(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 20027037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
    Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in term nulliparas with a latent phase of labor of more than 8 hours: a randomized trial.
    Sargunam PN; Bak LLM; Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Noor Azmi MA; Zaidi SN; Win ST; Omar SZ
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):493. PubMed ID: 31829138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Darney BG; Snowden JM; Cheng YW; Jacob L; Nicholson JM; Kaimal A; Dublin S; Getahun D; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.