These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32881631)

  • 21. Musicality - Tuned to the melody of vocal emotions.
    Nussbaum C; Schirmer A; Schweinberger SR
    Br J Psychol; 2024 May; 115(2):206-225. PubMed ID: 37851369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.
    Schvartz KC; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 22237163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of timbre and fundamental frequency in voice gender adaptation.
    Skuk VG; Dammann LM; Schweinberger SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1180-93. PubMed ID: 26328731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Use of Voice Cues for Speaker Gender Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Meister H; Fürsen K; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R; Walger M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):546-56. PubMed ID: 27135985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vocal emotion adaptation aftereffects within and across speaker genders: Roles of timbre and fundamental frequency.
    Nussbaum C; von Eiff CI; Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    Cognition; 2022 Feb; 219():104967. PubMed ID: 34875400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Galvin JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Meta-Analysis on the Identification of Linguistic and Emotional Prosody in Cochlear Implant Users and Vocoder Simulations.
    Everhardt MK; Sarampalis A; Coler M; Başkent D; Lowie W
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 32251011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.
    Peng SC; Lu N; Chatterjee M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 19372651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Role of Stimulus Type and Social Signal for Voice Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Response to the Letter by Meister et al.
    Schweinberger SR; von Eiff CI; Kirchen L; Oberhoffner T; Guntinas-Lichius O; Dobel C; Nussbaum C; Zäske R; Skuk VG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):4327-4328. PubMed ID: 33237837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing.
    Marx M; James C; Foxton J; Capber A; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 25303861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Oba SI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):EL98-103. PubMed ID: 19275282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contributions of fundamental frequency and timbre to vocal emotion perception and their electrophysiological correlates.
    Nussbaum C; Schirmer A; Schweinberger SR
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 17(12):1145-1154. PubMed ID: 35522247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: the role of spectral and temporal resolution.
    Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1711-8. PubMed ID: 16240829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceived naturalness of emotional voice morphs.
    Nussbaum C; Pöhlmann M; Kreysa H; Schweinberger SR
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):731-747. PubMed ID: 37104118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does good perception of vocal characteristics relate to better speech-on-speech intelligibility for cochlear implant users?
    El Boghdady N; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):417. PubMed ID: 30710943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Walger M; von Wedel H
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 19173112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognizing Voices Through a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review of Voice Perception, Talker Discrimination, and Talker Identification.
    Colby S; Orena AJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3165-3194. PubMed ID: 35926089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The perception of sentence stress in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Wagner P; Walger M
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 21187749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.