These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32883100)
1. Can CT-Based Stone Impaction Markers Augment the Predictive Ability of Spontaneous Stone Passage? Kachroo N; Jain R; Maskal S; Alshara L; Armanyous S; Milk J; Kahn L; Monga M; Sivalingam S J Endourol; 2021 Apr; 35(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 32883100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. CT-Based Predictors of Spontaneous Ureteral Stone Passage. Khan RU; Nazim SM; Anwar S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2024 Aug; 34(8):879-884. PubMed ID: 39113503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report. Yoshida T; Inoue T; Taguchi M; Omura N; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):913-919. PubMed ID: 30155728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can ureteral wall thickness (UWT) be used as a potential parameter for decision-making in uncomplicated distal ureteral stones 5-10 mm in size? A prospective study. Samir M; Elawady H; Hamid E; Tawfick A World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3555-3561. PubMed ID: 33738575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive value of NCCT quantitative analysis for proximal and middle impacted ureteral stones. Wei H; Shi X; Xu C; Li W; Zhang T; Huang Z; Yang J; Zhao X Urolithiasis; 2024 Aug; 52(1):120. PubMed ID: 39174805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiological signs of stone impaction add no value in predicting spontaneous stone passage. Popiolek M; Lidén M; Georgouleas P; Sahlén K; Sundqvist P; Jendeberg J Urolithiasis; 2024 Aug; 52(1):114. PubMed ID: 39105826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Ureteral Wall Thickness on Spontaneous Passage and Development of Long-term Ureteral Stricture in Patients with Ureteral Stone. Ekici O; Gul A; Zengin S; Boyaci C; Kilic M J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Jan; 33(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 36597243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Selvi I; Baydilli N; Tokmak TT; Akinsal EC; Basar H Urolithiasis; 2021 Jun; 49(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 32980972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a new scoring system predicting medical expulsive therapy success on 4-10 mm distal ureteral stones: medical expulsive therapy stone score (METSS). Uzun E; Arabaci HB; Ceviz K; Koudonas A; Germiyanoglu RC; Senel S Urolithiasis; 2023 Nov; 52(1):8. PubMed ID: 38015235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can serum procalcitonin levels be useful in predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage? Cilesiz NC; Ozkan A; Kalkanli A; Eroglu A; Gezmis CT; Simsek B; Arslan B BMC Urol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 32306948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of preoperative ureteral wall thickness in prediction of impaction of ureteric stones stratified by size in laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Abdrabuh AM; El-Agamy EI; Elhelaly MA; Abouelgreed TA; Abdel-Al I; Youssof HA; Elatreisy A; Shalkamy O; Elebiary M; Agha M; Tagreda I; Alrefaey A; Elawadey E BMC Urol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 36609272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ratio of CT attenuation values of the ureter above/below ureteral stones is a useful preoperative factor for predicting impacted ureteral stones. Deguchi R; Yamashita S; Iwahashi Y; Muraoka S; Kikkawa K; Kohjimoto Y; Hara I Urolithiasis; 2022 Oct; 50(5):643-649. PubMed ID: 35976424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of primary ureteroscopic lithotripsy: The role of maximum ureteral wall thickness at the site of stone impaction. Morena T; Vismara Fugini A; Veccia A; Riva M; Peroni A Urologia; 2024 Feb; 91(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 37491955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. Coll DM; Varanelli MJ; Smith RC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 11756098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients. Guler Y; Erbin A; Kafkasli A; Ozmerdiven G Urolithiasis; 2021 Feb; 49(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 32279108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peri-Calculus Ureteral Thickness on Computed Tomography Predicts Stone Impaction at Time of Surgery: A Prospective Study. Chandhoke R; Bamberger JN; Gallante B; Atallah W; Gupta M J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 31650853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence and predictors of stone passage after double J stenting for symptomatic ureteral stones: a cross-sectional, real-life study. Nogara A; Lucignani G; Turetti M; Silvani C; Marmiroli A; Nizzardo M; Gadda F; Zanetti SP; Longo F; De Lorenzis E; Albo G; Salonia A; Montanari E; Boeri L World J Urol; 2024 Jan; 42(1):8. PubMed ID: 38180579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Formula for predicting the impaction of ureteral stones. Özbir S; Can O; Atalay HA; Canat HL; Çakır SS; Ötünçtemur A Urolithiasis; 2020 Aug; 48(4):353-360. PubMed ID: 31378836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) assessment on the success of internal ureteral stent insertion in cases with obstructing ureteral calculi. Sarica K; Eryildirim B; Akdere H; Karagoz MA; Karaca Y; Sahan A Urolithiasis; 2021 Aug; 49(4):359-365. PubMed ID: 33388820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ureteral wall thickness at the stone site: A critical predictor of success and complications in children undergoing semi-rigid ureteroscopy. Kırlı EA; Bülbül E; Kaygısız O; Yeni S; Can G; Tutar O; Onal B J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Dec; 17(6):796.e1-796.e8. PubMed ID: 34750075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]