These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32883480)

  • 1. Moving towards integrating soil into spatial planning: No net loss of soil-based ecosystem services.
    Drobnik T; Schwaab J; Grêt-Regamey A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 263():110406. PubMed ID: 32883480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing policy and practice for marine net gain.
    Hooper T; Austen M; Lannin A
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 277():111387. PubMed ID: 33011423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecosystem service change caused by climatological and non-climatological drivers: a Swiss case study.
    Braun D; de Jong R; Schaepman ME; Furrer R; Hein L; Kienast F; Damm A
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01901. PubMed ID: 30980439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three ways to deliver a net positive impact with biodiversity offsets.
    Moilanen A; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 32390216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aligning biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in spatial planning: Focus on ecosystem processes.
    Van der Biest K; Meire P; Schellekens T; D'hondt B; Bonte D; Vanagt T; Ysebaert T
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 712():136350. PubMed ID: 32050402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the ecosystem services concept in landscape management in the Netherlands.
    van Wensem J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 23307692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the practical implementation of marine biodiversity offsetting in Australia.
    Niner HJ; Jones PJS; Milligan B; Styan C
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():113062. PubMed ID: 34157544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking the benefits of ecosystem services to sustainable spatial planning of ecological conservation strategies.
    Huang L; Cao W; Xu X; Fan J; Wang J
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 222():385-395. PubMed ID: 29870967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of human demand on conservation planning for biodiversity and ecosystem services.
    Watson KB; Galford GL; Sonter LJ; Koh I; Ricketts TH
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Aug; 33(4):942-952. PubMed ID: 30614054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Offsetting impacts of development on biodiversity and ecosystem services.
    Sonter LJ; Gordon A; Archibald C; Simmonds JS; Ward M; Metzger JP; Rhodes JR; Maron M
    Ambio; 2020 Apr; 49(4):892-902. PubMed ID: 31506844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cerrado ecoregions: A spatial framework to assess and prioritize Brazilian savanna environmental diversity for conservation.
    Sano EE; Rodrigues AA; Martins ES; Bettiol GM; Bustamante MMC; Bezerra AS; Couto AF; Vasconcelos V; Schüler J; Bolfe EL
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():818-828. PubMed ID: 30529869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for land use, biodiversity and ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: Impacts of breakfast cereals.
    Jeswani HK; Hellweg S; Azapagic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 645():51-59. PubMed ID: 30015118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands.
    Egoh BN; Reyers B; Rouget M; Richardson DM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jun; 92(6):1642-50. PubMed ID: 21334134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem services supply: Patterns across aquatic ecosystems.
    Teixeira H; Lillebø AI; Culhane F; Robinson L; Trauner D; Borgwardt F; Kuemmerlen M; Barbosa A; McDonald H; Funk A; O'Higgins T; Van der Wal JT; Piet G; Hein T; Arévalo-Torres J; Iglesias-Campos A; Barbière J; Nogueira AJA
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():517-534. PubMed ID: 30550915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity in a Rapidly Transforming Landscape in Northern Borneo.
    Labrière N; Laumonier Y; Locatelli B; Vieilledent G; Comptour M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140423. PubMed ID: 26466120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: A review.
    Holland JE; Bennett AE; Newton AC; White PJ; McKenzie BM; George TS; Pakeman RJ; Bailey JS; Fornara DA; Hayes RC
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 610-611():316-332. PubMed ID: 28806549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Litter decomposition driven by soil fauna, plant diversity and soil management in urban gardens.
    Tresch S; Frey D; Le Bayon RC; Zanetta A; Rasche F; Fliessbach A; Moretti M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 658():1614-1629. PubMed ID: 30678018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental mitigation hierarchy and biodiversity offsets revisited through habitat connectivity modelling.
    Bergès L; Avon C; Bezombes L; Clauzel C; Duflot R; Foltête JC; Gaucherand S; Girardet X; Spiegelberger T
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 256():109950. PubMed ID: 31818748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms.
    Rutgers M; van Wijnen HJ; Schouten AJ; Mulder C; Kuiten AM; Brussaard L; Breure AM
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 415():39-48. PubMed ID: 21704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.