282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32883545)
1. Late electrically-evoked compound action potentials as markers for acute micro-lesions of spiral ganglion neurons.
Konerding W; Arenberg JG; Kral A; Baumhoff P
Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 413():108057. PubMed ID: 32883545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation.
Konerding WS; Baumhoff P; Kral A
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Feb; 24(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 36459250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effects of GJB2 or SLC26A4 Gene Mutations on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve in Children.
Luo J; Xu L; Chao X; Wang R; Pellittieri A; Bai X; Fan Z; Wang H; He S
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31124793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes over time in the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap (IPG) effect following cochlear implantation in Guinea pigs.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Colesa DJ; Buswinka CJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107809. PubMed ID: 31630082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.
Xu L; Skidmore J; Luo J; Chao X; Wang R; Wang H; He S
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1306-1319. PubMed ID: 32141933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.
Ramekers D; Benav H; Klis SFL; Versnel H
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):721-738. PubMed ID: 35948695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: Triphasic pulses with anodic and cathodic second phase.
Herrmann DP; Kretzer KVA; Pieper SH; Bahmer A
Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 412():108375. PubMed ID: 34749281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels With Relatively Poor Electrode-Neuron Interfaces Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Jahn KN; Arenberg JG
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):961-973. PubMed ID: 31972772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological Estimates of the Electrode-Neuron Interface Differ Between Younger and Older Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Jahn KN; Arenberg JG
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):948-960. PubMed ID: 32032228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neurotrophin Gene Therapy in Deafened Ears with Cochlear Implants: Long-term Effects on Nerve Survival and Functional Measures.
Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Hughes AP; Strahl SB; Sinan M; Raphael Y
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 18(6):731-750. PubMed ID: 28776202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Broadly Applicable Method for Characterizing the Slope of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function.
Skidmore J; Ramekers D; Colesa DJ; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE; He S
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):150-164. PubMed ID: 34241983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.
Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of auditory nerve functional states on the correlations between human and computer decisions for electrically evoked compound action potential threshold.
Li Q; Zhang C; Lu T; Xu C; Sun Z; Fan W; Wang Z; Li S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109866. PubMed ID: 31945736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facilitation properties in electrically evoked compound action potentials depending on spatial location and on threshold.
Dambon J; Mewes A; Beyer A; Dambon J; Ambrosch P; Hey M
Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 438():108858. PubMed ID: 37556897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
