BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32884560)

  • 1. A comparative in vitro study on the cerumenolytic effect of docusate sodium versus 2.5% sodium bicarbonate using UV-visible absorption spectroscopy.
    Srisukhumchai C; Kasemsiri P; Rattanaanekchai T; Srirompotong S; Yordpratum U; Sakolsinsiri C
    J Otol; 2020 Sep; 15(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 32884560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cerumenolytic Efficacy of 2.5% Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Docusate Sodium: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Piromchai P; Laohakittikul C; Khunnawongkrit S; Srirompotong S
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e842-e847. PubMed ID: 32658399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Cerumenolytic Activities of New and Currently Used Agents.
    Anh NQ; Numthavaj P; Bhongmakapat T
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2022 Feb; 101(2_suppl):31S-36S. PubMed ID: 33512244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finding the most effective cerumenolytic.
    Saxby C; Williams R; Hickey S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Nov; 127(11):1067-70. PubMed ID: 24148313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ototoxicity of intratympanic docusate sodium and mineral oil in the guinea pig.
    Nader ME; Saliba I
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Mar; 146(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 22101097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new approach for cerumenolytic treatment in children: In vivo and in vitro study.
    Soy FK; Ozbay C; Kulduk E; Dundar R; Yazıcı H; Sakarya EU
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1096-100. PubMed ID: 25980373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ceruminolytic effects of docusate sodium: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Singer AJ; Sauris E; Viccellio AW
    Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Sep; 36(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 10969225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of common cerumenolytic agents: an in-vitro study.
    Bellini MJ; Terry RM; Lewis FA
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Feb; 14(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2465853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A nonprescription cerumenolytic.
    Chen DA; Caparosa RJ
    Am J Otol; 1991 Nov; 12(6):475-6. PubMed ID: 1725243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Back to basics: finding an optimal cerumenolytic (earwax solvent).
    Chalishazar U; Williams H
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Jul 12-25; 16(13):806-8. PubMed ID: 17851335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cerumenolytics with or without manual extraction for impacted earwax: A network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
    Sridharan K; Sivaramakrishnan G
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2021 May; 46(3):464-473. PubMed ID: 33326697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice tip. Which cerumenolytic?
    Kamien M
    Aust Fam Physician; 1999 Aug; 28(8):817, 828. PubMed ID: 10495532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ear drops for the removal of ear wax.
    Burton MJ; Doree C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jan; (1):CD004326. PubMed ID: 19160236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized clinical trial of docusate, triethanolamine polypeptide, and irrigation in cerumen removal in children.
    Whatley VN; Dodds CL; Paul RI
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2003 Dec; 157(12):1177-80. PubMed ID: 14662569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ear drops for the removal of ear wax.
    Burton MJ; Dorée CJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (3):CD004400. PubMed ID: 12918014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cerumen Impaction Removal in General Practices: A Comparison of Approved Standard Products.
    Meyer F; Preuß R; Angelow A; Chenot JF; Meyer E; Kiel S
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2020; 11():2150132720973829. PubMed ID: 33334227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen.
    Fullington D; Song J; Gilles A; Guo X; Hua W; Anderson CE; Griffin J
    BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord; 2017; 17():5. PubMed ID: 28588421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cerumen removal: comparison of cerumenolytic agents and effect on cognition among the elderly.
    Oron Y; Zwecker-Lazar I; Levy D; Kreitler S; Roth Y
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2011; 52(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 20417976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The bicarbonate-dependence of zinc(II)-transferrin binding.
    Harris WR; Stenback JZ
    J Inorg Biochem; 1988 Jul; 33(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 2843602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the Interaction Between an Ionic Surfactant and Polymer on the Dissolution of a Poorly Soluble Drug.
    Parikh V; Gumaste SG; Phadke S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2018 Oct; 19(7):3040-3047. PubMed ID: 30084069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.