These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32885263)

  • 41. Impact of withdrawal time on adenoma detection rate: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Desai M; Rex DK; Bohm ME; Davitkov P; DeWitt JM; Fischer M; Faulx G; Heath R; Imler TD; James-Stevenson TN; Kahi CJ; Kessler WR; Kohli DR; McHenry L; Rai T; Rogers NA; Sagi SV; Sathyamurthy A; Vennalaganti P; Sundaram S; Patel H; Higbee A; Kennedy K; Lahr R; Stojadinovikj G; Campbell C; Dasari C; Parasa S; Faulx A; Sharma P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):537-543.e2. PubMed ID: 36228700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
    Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Greenlaw RL
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):1091-8. PubMed ID: 18639495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.
    Ngu WS; Bevan R; Tsiamoulos ZP; Bassett P; Hoare Z; Rutter MD; Clifford G; Totton N; Lee TJ; Ramadas A; Silcock JG; Painter J; Neilson LJ; Saunders BP; Rees CJ
    Gut; 2019 Feb; 68(2):280-288. PubMed ID: 29363535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme.
    Hassan C; Senore C; Radaelli F; De Pretis G; Sassatelli R; Arrigoni A; Manes G; Amato A; Anderloni A; Armelao F; Mondardini A; Spada C; Omazzi B; Cavina M; Miori G; Campanale C; Sereni G; Segnan N; Repici A
    Gut; 2017 Nov; 66(11):1949-1955. PubMed ID: 27507903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Patel VD; Thompson WK; Lapin BR; Goldstein JL; Yen EF
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3084-3090. PubMed ID: 29974376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.
    De Palma GD; Giglio MC; Bruzzese D; Gennarelli N; Maione F; Siciliano S; Manzo B; Cassese G; Luglio G
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jan; 87(1):232-240. PubMed ID: 28082115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Nurse observation during colonoscopy increases polyp detection: a randomized prospective study.
    Aslanian HR; Shieh FK; Chan FW; Ciarleglio MM; Deng Y; Rogart JN; Jamidar PA; Siddiqui UD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 23381064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Kumar S; Thosani N; Ladabaum U; Friedland S; Chen AM; Kochar R; Banerjee S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 27931951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improving trainee colonoscopy performance by investigating the withdrawal time from individual colonic segments: a single-center observational study.
    Huang Y; Chen F; Xu G; Huang L; Wan R; Yang L; Chen C
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Aug; 10(8):8607-8616. PubMed ID: 34328014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adenoma detection by Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy in an organized screening program: the "ItaVision" randomized controlled trial.
    Zorzi M; Hassan C; Battagello J; Antonelli G; Pantalena M; Bulighin G; Alicante S; Meggiato T; Rosa-Rizzotto E; Iacopini F; Luigiano C; Monica F; Arrigoni A; Germanà B; Valiante F; Mallardi B; Senore C; Grazzini G; Mantellini P;
    Endoscopy; 2022 Feb; 54(2):138-147. PubMed ID: 33524994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Colonoscopy withdrawal time and polyp/adenoma detection rate: a single-site retrospective study in regional Queensland.
    Wong WJ; Arafat Y; Wang S; Hawes S; Hung K
    ANZ J Surg; 2020 Mar; 90(3):314-316. PubMed ID: 31957200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study.
    Halpern Z; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Shpak B; Pochapin M; Hoffman A; Mizrahi M; Rochberger YS; Moshkowitz M; Santo E; Melhem A; Grinshpon R; Pfefer J; Kiesslich R
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 25704662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial.
    Adler A; Aschenbeck J; Yenerim T; Mayr M; Aminalai A; Drossel R; Schröder A; Scheel M; Wiedenmann B; Rösch T
    Gastroenterology; 2009 Feb; 136(2):410-6.e1; quiz 715. PubMed ID: 19014944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Double review of the right colon vs single review during colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and adenomas: systematic review of the literature].
    Daza Castro EM; Torres López AR; Aponte D; Rocha Rodríguez JN; Sabbagh LC
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2023; 43(4):309-318. PubMed ID: 38228296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Desai M; Sanchez-Yague A; Choudhary A; Pervez A; Gupta N; Vennalaganti P; Vennelaganti S; Fugazza A; Repici A; Hassan C; Sharma P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):274-281.e3. PubMed ID: 28365356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
    Kahi CJ; Anderson JC; Waxman I; Kessler WR; Imperiale TF; Li X; Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
    Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of 9-Minute Withdrawal Time on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Zhao S; Yang X; Wang S; Meng Q; Wang R; Bo L; Chang X; Pan P; Xia T; Yang F; Yao J; Zheng J; Sheng J; Zhao X; Tang S; Wang Y; Wang Y; Gong A; Chen W; Shen J; Zhu X; Wang S; Yan C; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Ma RJ; Wang R; Ma Y; Li Z; Bai Y
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):e168-e181. PubMed ID: 33220526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
    Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.