243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32885318)
1. FRAX without BMD can be used to risk-stratify Veterans who recently sustained a low trauma non-vertebral/non-hip fracture.
Sagalla N; Colón-Emeric C; Sloane R; Lyles K; Vognsen J; Lee R
Osteoporos Int; 2021 Mar; 32(3):467-472. PubMed ID: 32885318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical risk factor status in patients with vertebral fracture but normal bone mineral density.
Kadri A; Binkley N; Daffner SD; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1634-1641. PubMed ID: 35680015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.
Chao AS; Chen FP; Lin YC; Huang TS; Fan CM; Yu YW
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 26700992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative bone health assessment and optimization in spine surgery.
Anderson PA; Kadri A; Hare KJ; Binkley N
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Aug; 49(2):E2. PubMed ID: 32738805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.
Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S
Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An optimal intervention threshold of FRAX in postmenopausal Thai women.
Sribenjalak D; Charoensri S; Pongchaiyakul C
Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jan; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 35072805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FRAX® with or without BMD and TBS predicts fragility fractures in community-dwelling rural southern Indian postmenopausal women.
Rajan R; Paul J; Cherian KE; Asha HS; Kapoor N; Paul TV
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jun; 15(1):82. PubMed ID: 32483672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FRAX score with and without bone mineral density: a comparison and factors affecting the discordance in osteoporosis treatment in Thais.
Teeratakulpisarn N; Charoensri S; Theerakulpisut D; Pongchaiyakul C
Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 33635451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY AND CALCULATED FRAX RISK SCORES MAY UNDERESTIMATE OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE RISK IN VITAMIN D-DEFICIENT VETERANS WITH HIV INFECTION.
Stephens KI; Rubinsztain L; Payan J; Rentsch C; Rimland D; Tangpricha V
Endocr Pract; 2016 Apr; 22(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 26684149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture Risk Indices From DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Predict Incident Fractures Independently From FRAX: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
Leslie WD; Luo Y; Yang S; Goertzen AL; Ahmed S; Delubac I; Lix LM
J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 30852033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.
Lin J; Yang Y; Fei Q; Zhang X; Ma Z; Wang Q; Li J; Li D; Meng Q; Wang B
Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():461-9. PubMed ID: 27217730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of electronic and manual fracture risk assessment tools in screening elderly male US veterans at risk for osteoporosis.
Williams ST; Lawrence PT; Miller KL; Crook JL; LaFleur J; Cannon GW; Nelson RE
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Nov; 28(11):3107-3111. PubMed ID: 28756457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of screening tools for optimizing fracture prevention in Canada.
Leslie WD; Lix LM; Binkley N
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Oct; 15(1):170. PubMed ID: 33111193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the fracture risk assessment tool for determining bone disease and the impact of secondary causes of osteoporosis in people living with HIV.
Vizcarra P; Gallego J; Vivancos MJ; Sifuentes WA; Llop M; Casado JL
HIV Res Clin Pract; 2020; 21(2-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 32698706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture in Patients with Normal Bone Mineral Density: An Evaluation of the American Orthopaedic Association's Own the Bone Registry.
Kadri A; Binkley N; Daffner SD; Anderson PA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Jan; 105(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 36575157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osteoporosis treatment considerations based upon fracture history, fracture risk assessment, vertebral fracture assessment, and bone density in Canada.
Leslie WD; Lix LM; Binkley N
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jun; 15(1):93. PubMed ID: 32577922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three tools for predicting primary osteoporosis in an elderly male population in Beijing: a cross-sectional study.
Zhang X; Lin J; Yang Y; Wu H; Li Y; Yang X; Fei Q
Clin Interv Aging; 2018; 13():201-209. PubMed ID: 29440880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection of women aged 50-64 yr for bone density measurement.
Leslie WD; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):570-8. PubMed ID: 23452870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
