These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32885460)

  • 1. Selection bias in studies of birth defects among livebirths: Much ado about nothing?
    Khoshnood B
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 34(6):665-667. PubMed ID: 32885460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconstructing a Pregnancy Cohort to Examine Potential Selection Bias in Studies on Racial Disparities in Preterm Delivery.
    Sapra KJ; Chaurasia AK; Hutcheon JA; Ahrens KA
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 27794171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Much ado about nothing.
    Gennaro S; Vessey JA
    Nurs Res; 1992; 41(5):259. PubMed ID: 1523105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on birth certificates: Florida and Massachusetts, 2004-06.
    Cohen B; Bernson D; Sappenfield W; Kirby RS; Kissin D; Zhang Y; Copeland G; Zhang Z; Macaluso M;
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2014 May; 28(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 24533655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusting for bias due to incomplete case ascertainment in case-control studies of birth defects.
    Howards PP; Johnson CY; Honein MA; Flanders WD;
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 181(8):595-607. PubMed ID: 25792608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of fetal number on antepartum uterine activity.
    Parks BA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Nov; 74(5):830. PubMed ID: 2812663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Descriptive profile of birth defects among livebirths in Singapore.
    Thein MM; Koh D; Tan KL; Lee HP; Yip YY; Tye CY; Phoon WO
    Teratology; 1992 Sep; 46(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 1523586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrelationships of relative risks of birth defects in embryonic and fetal deaths, in livebirths, and in all conceptuses.
    Regal RR; Hook EB
    Epidemiology; 1992 May; 3(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 1591324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-selection and bias in a large prospective pregnancy cohort in Norway.
    Nilsen RM; Vollset SE; Gjessing HK; Skjaerven R; Melve KK; Schreuder P; Alsaker ER; Haug K; Daltveit AK; Magnus P
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 23(6):597-608. PubMed ID: 19840297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "The effect of presentation and mode of delivery on neonatal outcome in the second twin"--is this study biased?
    Mittendorf R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 169(2 Pt 1):438-9. PubMed ID: 8362966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Selection Bias in an Internet-based Study of Pregnancy Planners.
    Hatch EE; Hahn KA; Wise LA; Mikkelsen EM; Kumar R; Fox MP; Brooks DR; Riis AH; Sorensen HT; Rothman KJ
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 26484423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection bias and patterns of confounding in cohort studies: the case of the NINFEA web-based birth cohort.
    Pizzi C; De Stavola BL; Pearce N; Lazzarato F; Ghiotti P; Merletti F; Richiardi L
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Nov; 66(11):976-81. PubMed ID: 22147750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection bias and the use of controls with malformations in case-control studies of birth defects.
    Lieff S; Olshan AF; Werler M; Savitz DA; Mitchell AA
    Epidemiology; 1999 May; 10(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 10230831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Representative and misrepresentative associations of birth defects in livebirths. Conditions under which relative risks greater than unity in livebirths necessarily imply relative risks greater than unity in all conceptuses.
    Hook EB; Regal RR
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Mar; 137(6):660-75. PubMed ID: 8470668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection bias in prenatal care use by Medicaid recipients.
    Bell JF; Zimmerman FJ
    Matern Child Health J; 2003 Dec; 7(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 14682501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.
    Siristatidis CS; Sertedaki E; Vaidakis D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011872. PubMed ID: 28534597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies.
    Biele G; Gustavson K; Czajkowski NO; Nilsen RM; Reichborn-Kjennerud T; Magnus PM; Stoltenberg C; Aase H
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 34(10):927-938. PubMed ID: 31451995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for the assessment of selection bias in drug safety during pregnancy studies using electronic medical data.
    Schnitzer ME; Blais L
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2018 Oct; 6(5):e00426. PubMed ID: 30258633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vitamins during pregnancy and neural tube defects.
    JAMA; 1990 May 23-30; 263(20):2747-9. PubMed ID: 2332916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Much ado about nothing? Diagnosis and management of obstetric cholestasis.
    McDermott E
    Pract Midwife; 2001 Apr; 4(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 12026607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.