BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32885565)

  • 1. How to implement routine electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring in oncology rehabilitation.
    Wintner LM; Sztankay M; Riedl D; Rumpold G; Nickels A; Licht T; Holzner B
    Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Apr; 75(4):e13694. PubMed ID: 32885565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usability of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Older Patients With Cancer: Secondary Analysis of Data from an Observational Single Center Study.
    Riedl D; Lehmann J; Rothmund M; Dejaco D; Grote V; Fischer MJ; Rumpold G; Holzner B; Licht T
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e49476. PubMed ID: 37733409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-world use and clinical impact of an electronic patient-reported outcome tool in patients with solid tumors treated with immuno-oncology therapy.
    Dickson NR; Beauchamp KD; Perry TS; Roush A; Goldschmidt D; Edwards ML; Blakely LJ
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2024 Feb; 8(1):23. PubMed ID: 38416270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry.
    Sztankay M; Neppl L; Wintner LM; Loth FL; Willenbacher W; Weger R; Weyrer W; Steurer M; Rumpold G; Holzner B
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Nov; 28(6):e13154. PubMed ID: 31465136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services.
    Knowles SE; Ercia A; Caskey F; Rees M; Farrington K; Van der Veer SN
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jul; 21(1):706. PubMed ID: 34273978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring.
    Holzner B; Giesinger JM; Pinggera J; Zugal S; Schöpf F; Oberguggenberger AS; Gamper EM; Zabernigg A; Weber B; Rumpold G
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Nov; 12():126. PubMed ID: 23140270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tenets for Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Remote Symptom Monitoring During Cancer Treatment.
    Basch E; Rocque G; Mody G; Mullangi S; Patt D
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2023 Feb; 7():e2200187. PubMed ID: 36857630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study within a trial of electronic versus paper-based Patient-Reported oUtcomes CollEction (SPRUCE): study protocol for a partially randomised patient preference study.
    Philipps L; Foster S; Gardiner D; Gath J; Gillman A; Haviland J; Hill E; King D; Manning G; Stiles M; Hall E; Lewis R
    BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e073817. PubMed ID: 37734892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Essential barriers and considerations for the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) measures in oncological practice: contextualizing the results of a feasibility study with existing literature.
    Kiderlen TR; Schnack A; de Wit M
    Z Gesundh Wiss; 2022 Oct; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 36320803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment in inpatient cancer care: a feasibility study.
    Salm H; Hentschel L; Eichler M; Pink D; Fuhrmann S; Kramer M; Reichardt P; Schuler MK
    Support Care Cancer; 2023 Sep; 31(10):575. PubMed ID: 37707633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficacy of Cancer Treatment with Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring and Future Expectations].
    Katsura H; Zenitani S
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2024 Apr; 51(4):353-367. PubMed ID: 38644298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Getting ready for real-world use of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for patients with cancer: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network ePRO Workgroup paper.
    Cracchiolo JR; Arafat W; Atreja A; Bruckner L; Emamekhoo H; Heinrichs T; Raldow AC; Smerage J; Stetson P; Sugalski J; Tevaarwerk AJ
    Cancer; 2023 Aug; 129(16):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 37224181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Novel Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Platform for Head and Neck Oncology Patients-A Pilot Study.
    Peltola MK; Lehikoinen JS; Sippola LT; Saarilahti K; Mäkitie AA
    Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat; 2016; 9():1-6. PubMed ID: 27721662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection Systems in Oncology Clinical Trials: A Survey of Clinical Research Professionals (an Alliance Study).
    Cho Y; Lavoie Smith EM; Zahrieh D; Chow SL; Williams DA; Saint Arnault D; Jiang Y
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2023 Sep; 7():e2300007. PubMed ID: 37677111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-reported outcomes used actively in cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment: A mini-review of the Danish landscape.
    Pappot H; Taarnhøj GA; Bentsen L; Friis RB; Bæksted C; Christiansen MG; Holländer-Mieritz C; Møller PK; Rasmussen IML; Lund-Jacobsen T; Stormoen DR; Tolstrup LK
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2024 Dec; 24():23-30. PubMed ID: 38076643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during cancer treatment: the importance of getting it right.
    Basch E; Hudson K; Rocque G
    J Comp Eff Res; 2023 Dec; 12(12):e230157. PubMed ID: 37961992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to Develop and Implement Computerized Comprehensive Clinical Database in Oncology-the Way Forward.
    Deo SVS; Bansal B; Kumar S
    Indian J Surg Oncol; 2023 Mar; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 36891426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selecting, implementing and evaluating patient-reported outcome measures for routine clinical use in cancer: the Cancer Care Ontario approach.
    Montgomery N; Howell D; Ismail Z; Bartlett SJ; Brundage M; Bryant-Lukosius D; Krzyzanowska M; Moody L; Snyder C; Barbera L;
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2020 Nov; 4(1):101. PubMed ID: 33242136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pre-implementation examination of barriers and facilitators of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study.
    Lopez CJ; Jones JM; Campbell KL; Bender JL; Strudwick G; Langelier DM; Reiman T; Greenland J; Neil-Sztramko SE
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Jan; 24(1):17. PubMed ID: 38178095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Involving Patients and Clinicians in the Design of Wireframes for Cancer Medicines Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Care: Mixed Methods Study.
    Dunlop E; Ferguson A; Mueller T; Baillie K; Laskey J; Clarke J; Kurdi A; Wales A; Connolly T; Bennie M
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Dec; 7():e48296. PubMed ID: 38127422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.