210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32885613)
1. Fit of tooth-supported zirconia single crowns-A systematic review of the literature.
Ahmed WM; Shariati B; Gazzaz AZ; Sayed ME; Carvalho RM
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Dec; 6(6):700-716. PubMed ID: 32885613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns.
Comlekoglu M; Dundar M; Ozcan M; Gungor M; Gokce B; Artunc C
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 19830974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of preparation angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM system.
Beuer F; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Naumann M
Dent Mater J; 2008 Nov; 27(6):814-20. PubMed ID: 19241690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings.
Iwai T; Komine F; Kobayashi K; Saito A; Matsumura H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 18607834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An In Vivo Evaluation of the Fit of Zirconium-Oxide Based, Ceramic Single Crowns with Vertical and Horizontal Finish Line Preparations.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S; Biscaro L; Stellini E
J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 26359654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of surface treatment of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconium oxides and cement type on crown retention after artificial aging.
Karimipour-Saryazdi M; Sadid-Zadeh R; Givan D; Burgess JO; Ramp LC; Liu PR
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 24529652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of preparation angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia crown copings.
Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Richter J; Edelhoff D; Gernet W
Quintessence Int; 2009 Mar; 40(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 19417888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of preparation design on the fracture resistance of zirconia crown copings.
Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Edelhoff D; Gernet W
Dent Mater J; 2008 May; 27(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 18717163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An In Vitro Comparison of Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Crowns With Heavy Chamfer and Shoulder Finish Lines.
Yadav P; Sharma V; Paliwal J; Meena KK; Madaan R; Gurjar B
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33940. PubMed ID: 36819334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of cement gap and drill offset on the marginal and internal fit discrepancies of crowns designed with different tooth preparations.
Xu SX; Tong XL; Tan FB; Yu N; Ma CY
Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Nov; 26(4):319-330. PubMed ID: 36749283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
