These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32887921)

  • 21. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Jan; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 11228838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements.
    Jackson SR; Shaw A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Feb; 26(1):418-23. PubMed ID: 10696627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.
    Le A; Niemeier M
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 230(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 23857170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Grasping of Real-World Objects Is Not Biased by Ensemble Perception.
    Fan AW; Guo LL; Frost A; Whitwell RL; Niemeier M; Cant JS
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():597691. PubMed ID: 33912099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Looking at the Ebbinghaus illusion: differences in neurocomputational requirements, not gaze-mediated attention, explain a classic perception-action dissociation.
    Whitwell RL; Garach MA; Goodale MA; Sperandio I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1869):20210459. PubMed ID: 36511402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FMRI reveals a dissociation between grasping and perceiving the size of real 3D objects.
    Cavina-Pratesi C; Goodale MA; Culham JC
    PLoS One; 2007 May; 2(5):e424. PubMed ID: 17487272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions.
    Katsumata H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accurate visuomotor control below the perceptual threshold of size discrimination.
    Ganel T; Freud E; Chajut E; Algom D
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e36253. PubMed ID: 22558407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusion effect on action? A multi-lab replication study.
    Kopiske KK; Bruno N; Hesse C; Schenk T; Franz VH
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():130-52. PubMed ID: 27156056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consciously monitored grasping is vulnerable to perceptual intrusions.
    Navon G; Ganel T
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Oct; 85():103019. PubMed ID: 32979618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.
    Ozana A; Berman S; Ganel T
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():573352. PubMed ID: 33329216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does bimanual grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion provide evidence for a functional segregation of dorsal and ventral streams?
    Foster RM; Kleinholdermann U; Leifheit S; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3392-402. PubMed ID: 23010064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The combination of target motion and dynamic changes in context greatly enhance visual size illusions.
    Mruczek REB; Fanelli M; Kelly S; Caplovitz GP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():959367. PubMed ID: 36188172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Taking a hands-on approach: apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size.
    Linkenauger SA; Witt JK; Proffitt DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1432-41. PubMed ID: 21728460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of the Uznadze illusion is temporally dynamic in closed-loop but temporally constant in open-loop grasping.
    Uccelli S; Bruno N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 37784227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differential effects of delay upon visually and haptically guided grasping and perceptual judgments.
    Pettypiece CE; Culham JC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 May; 195(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 19404627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of the Sander parallelogram illusion and early, middle and late vision on goal-directed reaching and grasping.
    Carther-Krone TA; Senanayake SA; Marotta JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Dec; 238(12):2993-3003. PubMed ID: 33095294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.