These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32888153)

  • 1. Remediation of brownfields contaminated by organic compounds and heavy metals: a bench-scale test of a sulfur/vermiculite sorbent for mercury vapor removal.
    Topka P; Soukup K; Hejtmánek V; Hlásenský I; Kaštánek F; Šolcová O
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(33):42182-42188. PubMed ID: 32888153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Possibilities of mercury removal in the dry flue gas cleaning lines of solid waste incineration units.
    Svoboda K; Hartman M; Šyc M; Pohořelý M; Kameníková P; Jeremiáš M; Durda T
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():499-511. PubMed ID: 26588812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of vapor-phase elemental mercury from stack emissions with sulfur-impregnated activated carbon.
    Sowlat MH; Abdollahi M; Gharibi H; Yunesian M; Rastkari N
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():1-34. PubMed ID: 24609516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel regenerable sorbent for mercury capture from flue gases of coal-fired power plant.
    Liu Y; Kelly DJ; Yang H; Lin CC; Kuznicki SM; Xu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug; 42(16):6205-10. PubMed ID: 18767688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Silver impregnated carbon for adsorption and desorption of elemental mercury vapors.
    Karatza D; Prisciandaro M; Lancia A; Musmarra D
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(9):1578-84. PubMed ID: 22432297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of mercury adsorption and cyclic mercury retention over MnO
    Yao T; Duan Y; Zhu C; Zhou Q; Xu J; Liu M; Wei H
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jul; 202():358-365. PubMed ID: 29574389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers (ACFs).
    Hsi HC; Rood MJ; Rostam-Abadi M; Chen S; Chang R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jul; 35(13):2785-91. PubMed ID: 11452610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioregeneration of spent mercury bearing sulfur-impregnated activated carbon adsorbent.
    Chen SY; Hsi HC; Shih MY
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(6):5095-5104. PubMed ID: 28573563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A sulfur-resistant CuS-modified active coke for mercury removal from municipal solid waste incineration flue gas.
    Liu W; Zhou Y; Hua Y; Peng B; Deng M; Yan N; Qu Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):24831-24839. PubMed ID: 31240653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adsorption of elemental mercury vapors from synthetic exhaust combustion gas onto HGR carbon.
    Musmarra D; Karatza D; Lancia A; Prisciandaro M; Mazziotti di Celso G
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Jul; 66(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 27043167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mercury removal from MSW incineration flue gas by mineral-based sorbents.
    Rumayor M; Svoboda K; Švehla J; Pohořelý M; Šyc M
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():265-270. PubMed ID: 29248369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of Nano-Sulfide Sorbent for Efficient Removal of Elemental Mercury from Coal Combustion Fuel Gas.
    Li H; Zhu L; Wang J; Li L; Shih K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 50(17):9551-7. PubMed ID: 27508312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of cost-effective noncarbon sorbents for Hg(0) removal from coal-fired power plants.
    Lee JY; Ju Y; Keener TC; Varma RS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Apr; 40(8):2714-20. PubMed ID: 16683613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-step synthesis of N, S co-doped waste-derived nanoporous carbon sorbent for mercury vapor removal.
    Vakili F; Rashidi A; Taghavi L; Mansouri N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17265-17274. PubMed ID: 33394405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sorption and stability of mercury on activated carbon for emission control.
    Graydon JW; Zhang X; Kirk DW; Jia CQ
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 168(2-3):978-82. PubMed ID: 19327890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of a sorbent trap system to gas-phase elemental and oxidized mercury analysis.
    Zhang Z; Eom Y; Lee MJ; Lee TG
    Chemosphere; 2016 Jul; 154():293-299. PubMed ID: 27060637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient Removal of Elemental Mercury from Coal-Fired Flue Gas over Sulfur-Containing Sorbent at Low Temperatures.
    Zhang G; Wang Z; Cui L; Zhang X; Chen S; Dong Y
    ACS Omega; 2019 Nov; 4(21):19399-19407. PubMed ID: 31763564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CeO2-TiO2 sorbents for the removal of elemental mercury from syngas.
    Zhou J; Hou W; Qi P; Gao X; Luo Z; Cen K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 47(17):10056-62. PubMed ID: 23931010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinetics of Vapor-Phase Mercury Uptake by Virgin and Sulfur-Impregnated Activated Carbons.
    Vidic RD; Chang MT; Thurnau RC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1998 Mar; 48(3):247-255. PubMed ID: 29091549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uptake of Elemental Mercury Vapors by Activated Carbons.
    Vidic RD; McLaughlin JB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1996 Mar; 46(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 28065140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.