These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32889846)

  • 21. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
    Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ventilatory performance of AMBU® AuraGain™ and LMA® Supreme™ in laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Drakeford PA; Ng V; Seng Z; Chua M; Tan N; Mathew D; Teoh WH
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2021 Sep; 49(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 34550812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of I-Gel
    Jain D; Ghai B; Gandhi K; Banerjee G; Bala I; Samujh R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Dec; 26(12):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 27779349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Comparison Between Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube With Respect to Adequacy of Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia-A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study, and Comparative Study.
    Bhushan D; Nandkumar S; Butani M
    Asian J Anesthesiol; 2022 Mar; 60():. PubMed ID: 35279972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® Supreme™ supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial.
    Wong DT; Ooi A; Singh KP; Dallaire A; Meliana V; Lau J; Chung F; Singh M; Wong J
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jul; 65(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 29582360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. AutoFlow® versus volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic gynecological surgery using LMA® ProSeal™: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nakanishi T; Sakamoto S; Yoshimura M; Toriumi T
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):181. PubMed ID: 34182933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure.
    Somri M; Vaida S; Garcia Fornari G; Mendoza GR; Charco-Mora P; Hawash N; Matter I; Swaid F; Gaitini L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 27716165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation.
    Teoh WH; Lee KM; Suhitharan T; Yahaya Z; Teo MM; Sia AT
    Anaesthesia; 2010 Dec; 65(12):1173-9. PubMed ID: 20958278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Randomized comparison of the Baska FESS mask and the LMA Supreme in different head and neck positions.
    Foo LL; Shariffuddin II; Chaw SH; Lee PK; Lee CE; Chen YS; Chan L
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Aug; 15(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 30095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients.
    Atef HM; Helmy AM; El-Taher EM; Henidak AM
    Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 21(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 23327031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Device stability and quality of ventilation of classic laryngeal mask airway versus AIR-Q and I-gel at different head and neck positions in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children.
    Abdel-Ghaffar HS; Abdelal FA; Osman MA; Soliman OM
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Mar; 86(3):286-294. PubMed ID: 31922375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.
    Chan WK; Liu CY
    Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.
    Oba S; Turk HS; Isil CT; Erdogan H; Sayin P; Dokucu AI
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children.
    Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Gordon J; Langen KE; Anderson K
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 22420717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
    Theiler LG; Kleine-Brueggeney M; Kaiser D; Urwyler N; Luyet C; Vogt A; Greif R; Unibe MM
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supremeTM as non-inflatable cuff device and self-pressurized air-QTM in children: Randomized controlled non-inferiority study.
    Hwang J; Hong B; Kim YH; Lee WH; Jo Y; Youn S; Lim CS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(10):e14746. PubMed ID: 30855468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Brimacombe J; von Goedecke A; Keller C; Brimacombe L; Brimacombe M
    Anesth Analg; 2004 Nov; 99(5):1560-1563. PubMed ID: 15502065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.
    Biedler A; Wrobel M; Schneider S; Soltész S; Ziegeler S; Grundmann U
    J Anesth; 2013 Oct; 27(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 23460409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.