These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32890302)

  • 1. Physical Performance Tests Provide Distinct Information in Both Predicting and Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Spine Surgery.
    Master H; Pennings JS; Coronado RA; Henry AL; O'Brien MT; Haug CM; Skolasky RL; Riley LH; Neuman BJ; Cheng JS; Aaronson OS; Devin CJ; Wegener ST; Archer KR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Dec; 45(23):E1556-E1563. PubMed ID: 32890302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Depression on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Spine Decompression.
    Merrill RK; Zebala LP; Peters C; Qureshi SA; McAnany SJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Mar; 43(6):434-439. PubMed ID: 28704333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function in MIS TLIF: 2-Year Follow-up.
    Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Sayari AJ; Geoghegan CE; Jadczak CN; Mohan S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(22):E1516-E1522. PubMed ID: 32756287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.
    Kim EJ; Chotai S; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Schneider BJ; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27777051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy for Patients With Chronic Pain Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Archer KR; Devin CJ; Vanston SW; Koyama T; Phillips SE; Mathis SL; George SZ; McGirt MJ; Spengler DM; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Wegener ST
    J Pain; 2016 Jan; 17(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 26476267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-reported outcomes unbiased by length of follow-up after lumbar degenerative spine surgery: Do we need 2 years of follow-up?
    Staartjes VE; Siccoli A; de Wispelaere MP; Schröder ML
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):637-644. PubMed ID: 30296576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-Term Follow-Up of a Person-Centered Prehabilitation Program Based on Cognitive-Behavioral Physical Therapy for Patients Scheduled for Lumbar Fusion.
    Kemani MK; Hanafi R; Brisby H; Lotzke H; Lundberg M
    Phys Ther; 2024 Aug; 104(8):. PubMed ID: 38753831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient Reported Outcomes in Patients Who Stop Following Up: Are They Doing Better or Worse Than the Patients That Come Back?
    Chen DA; Vaishnav AS; Louie PK; Gang CH; McAnany SJ; Iyer S; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(20):1435-1442. PubMed ID: 32453236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AY; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E3. PubMed ID: 29290130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of multijoint symptoms on patient-reported disability following surgery for lumbar spine osteoarthritis.
    Perruccio AV; Power JD; Yip C; Badley EM; Canizares M; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2021 Jan; 21(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 32805432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.