BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3289095)

  • 1. Carcinoma of the breast: detection with MR imaging versus xeromammography.
    Turner DA; Alcorn FS; Shorey WD; Stelling CB; Mategrano VC; Merten CW; Silver B; Economou SG; Straus AK; Witt TR
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 3289095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fat necrosis of the breast: characteristic xeromammographic appearance.
    Orson LW; Cigtay OS
    Radiology; 1983 Jan; 146(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 6849065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
    Fobben ES; Rubin CZ; Kalisher L; Dembner AG; Seltzer MH; Santoro EJ
    Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 7784558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Xeromammographic diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast in office practice.
    Burhenne LW; Longley JD; Burhenne HJ
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 May; 164(5):452-6. PubMed ID: 3576422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Palpable breast masses: evaluation by high frequency, hand-held real-time sonography and xeromammography. Work in progress.
    Fleischer AC; Muhletaler CA; Reynolds VH; Machin JE; Thieme GA; Bundy AL; Winfield AC; James AE
    Radiology; 1983 Sep; 148(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 6878706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
    Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The choice of radiologic procedures in the diagnosis of breast disease.
    Pera A; Freimanis AK
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 14(3):635-50. PubMed ID: 3323968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of paraffinomas and siliconomas after mammoplasty.
    Wang J; Shih TT; Li YW; Chang KJ; Huang HY
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2002 Feb; 101(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 12099202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
    Gökalp G; Topal U
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single view negative mode xeromammography: an approach to reduce radiation exposure in breast cancer screening.
    Buchanan JB; Jager RM
    Radiology; 1977 Apr; 123(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 847175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound demonstration of giant malignant breast cyst undetected by xeromammography.
    Cooke CG; Grant EG; Cigtay OS
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1981 Oct; 9(8):461-2. PubMed ID: 6271813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model.
    Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Orel SG; Hochman MG; Langlotz CP; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
    Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):833-41. PubMed ID: 9051042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Plain MR imaging of breast lesions: a study using 3 mm slice thickness].
    Kumagai H; Ito H; Hashimoto S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jul; 53(7):801-5. PubMed ID: 8378140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screen-film mammography versus xeromammography in the detection of breast cancer.
    Cuttino JT; Yankaskas BC; Hoskins EO
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Dec; 59(708):1159-62. PubMed ID: 3801794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
    Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging combined with T2-weighted images in the detection of small breast cancer: a single-center multi-observer study.
    Wu LM; Chen J; Hu J; Gu HY; Xu JR; Hua J
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Feb; 55(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23878358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Value of xeromammography in the diagnosis of microcarcinoma of breast].
    Hu YS; Liu JZ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1987 Oct; 25(10):564-8, 612, 49. PubMed ID: 2835213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of xeromammography and film mammography in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Brebner DM; Judelman E
    S Afr Med J; 1975 Aug; 49(34):1380-2. PubMed ID: 1162514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.
    Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Bluemke DA; Maranto C; Arnold C; Herskovits EH; Bhujwalla Z
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 14519877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.