160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3289096)
1. One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: clinical evaluation of film images.
Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Ikeda M
Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 3289096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Naito H; Arisawa J; Tamura S; Kozuka T; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):407-12. PubMed ID: 7824718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical application of single dual-energy subtraction technique with digital storage-phosphor radiography.
Kamimura R; Takashima T
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):21-4. PubMed ID: 7734535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Radiological assessment of pulmonary function by computed radiography with imaging plates].
Ishigaki T; Itoh K; Sakuma S
Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 27(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 2615080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of calcification in pulmonary nodules using bone images obtained with single exposure energy subtraction].
Kobayashi T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 55(9):638-45. PubMed ID: 7478948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation Between Contrast-Detail Analysis and Clinical Image Quality Assessment of Intrapulmonary Lesions in Dual-Energy Subtraction Chest Radiography Using the Two-Shot Method: A Phantom Study.
Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Kanzaki Y; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y
Acad Radiol; 2024 May; 31(5):2118-2127. PubMed ID: 38008645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic usefulness of chest computed radiography--film versus cathode-ray tube images.
Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Endo T; Ikeda M
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):25-30. PubMed ID: 7734536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Conventional radiography and digital radiography of the thorax: evaluation of anatomo-radiological parameters].
Del Maschio A; Vanzulli A; Panizza P; Del Maschio M; Rodighiero M; Cucchi E; Zanello A; Sironi S
Radiol Med; 1989 Jun; 77(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 2756178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irreversible data compression in chest imaging using computed radiography: an evaluation.
Mori T; Nakata H
J Thorac Imaging; 1994; 9(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8114161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fundamental and clinical evaluation of chest computed tomography imaging in detectability of pulmonary nodule.
Milla N; Ito K; Ikeda M; Nakamura K; Hirose M; Ishigaki T
Nagoya J Med Sci; 1994 Dec; 57(3-4):127-32. PubMed ID: 7898568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical results of dual-energy radiography in thoracic studies].
Bautz W; Kalender WA
Rofo; 1987 May; 146(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 3035630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: comparison between standard and inverse digitized images and conventional chest radiographs.
Sheline ME; Brikman I; Epstein DM; Mezrich JL; Kundel HL; Arenson RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Feb; 152(2):261-3. PubMed ID: 2783501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital chest radiography: comparison of unprocessed and processed images in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Correa J; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Malagari KS; Tucker DM; Larkin JJ; Kuhlman J; Barnes GT; Zerhouni EA; Fraser RG
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 7892481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital radiography: optimization of chest radiographs using a modified exposure control].
Reichelt S; Oestmann JW; Prokop M; Hagemann G; Knüpfer W; Galanski M
Rofo; 1991 Feb; 154(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 1847538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mineral content of bone: measurement by energy subtraction digital chest radiography.
Friedman SE; Dubovsky EV; Dubovsky J; Alexander CB; Robinson CA; Sabbagh EA; Barnes GT; Fraser RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1199-202. PubMed ID: 3318343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chest radiographs obtained with shaped filters: evaluation by observer performance tests.
Kelsey CA; Lane RG; Moseley RD; Mettler FA; Rosenberg RD; Williams AG; Garcia JF; Feldman BS; Boardman RE
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):653-5. PubMed ID: 3704147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
