These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32891048)
21. Benthic monitoring of oil and gas offshore platforms in the North Sea using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mauffrey F; Cordier T; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Cermakova K; Merzi T; Delefosse M; Blanc P; Pawlowski J Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3007-3022. PubMed ID: 33070453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Responses of foraminifera communities to aquaculture-derived organic enrichment as revealed by environmental DNA metabarcoding. He X; Sutherland TF; Pawlowski J; Abbott CL Mol Ecol; 2019 Mar; 28(5):1138-1153. PubMed ID: 30614581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bacterial diversity in the waterholes of the Kruger National Park: an eDNA metabarcoding approach Farrell MJ; Govender D; Hajibabaei M; van der Bank M; Davies TJ Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):229-242. PubMed ID: 30495980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding. Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tracking the impacts of nutrient inputs on estuary ecosystem function. Suzzi AL; Gaston TF; McKenzie L; Mazumder D; Huggett MJ Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 811():152405. PubMed ID: 34923003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes. Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Metabarcoding improves detection of eukaryotes from early biofouling communities: implications for pest monitoring and pathway management. Zaiko A; Schimanski K; Pochon X; Hopkins GA; Goldstien S; Floerl O; Wood SA Biofouling; 2016 Jul; 32(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 27212415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods. Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diatom eDNA metabarcoding and morphological methods for bioassessment of karstic river. Kulaš A; Gligora Udovič M; Tapolczai K; Žutinić P; Orlić S; Levkov Z Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 829():154536. PubMed ID: 35304150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Predicting Anthropogenic Pollution in Rivers. Li F; Peng Y; Fang W; Altermatt F; Xie Y; Yang J; Zhang X Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 52(20):11708-11719. PubMed ID: 30211550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterizing temporal variability in streams supports nutrient indicator development using diatom and bacterial DNA metabarcoding. Smucker NJ; Pilgrim EM; Wu H; Nietch CT; Darling JA; Molina M; Johnson BR; Yuan LL Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 831():154960. PubMed ID: 35378187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers. Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fine sediment and flow velocity impact bacterial community and functional profile more than nutrient enrichment. Juvigny-Khenafou NPD; Piggott JJ; Atkinson D; Zhang Y; Wu N; Matthaei CD Ecol Appl; 2021 Jan; 31(1):e02212. PubMed ID: 32754996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Phytoplankton settling quality has a subtle but significant effect on sediment microeukaryotic and bacterial communities. Albert S; Hedberg P; Motwani NH; Sjöling S; Winder M; Nascimento FJA Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):24033. PubMed ID: 34911983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diatom diversity through HTS-metabarcoding in coastal European seas. Piredda R; Claverie JM; Decelle J; de Vargas C; Dunthorn M; Edvardsen B; Eikrem W; Forster D; Kooistra WHCF; Logares R; Massana R; Montresor M; Not F; Ogata H; Pawlowski J; Romac S; Sarno D; Stoeck T; Zingone A Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):18059. PubMed ID: 30584235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Monitoring of benthic eukaryotic communities in two tropical coastal lagoons through eDNA metabarcoding: a spatial and temporal approximation. Castro-Cubillos ML; Taylor JD; Mastretta-Yanes A; Benítez-Villalobos F; Islas-Villanueva V Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10089. PubMed ID: 35710829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water. Holman LE; de Bruyn M; Creer S; Carvalho G; Robidart J; Rius M Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11559. PubMed ID: 31399606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]