279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32891319)
1. Survival outcomes of single-port access laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Eoh KJ; Li LY; Shin W; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():140-145. PubMed ID: 32891319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Chua PT; Mendoza MCVR; Lee PS; Lai SY
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 33966729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nerve-sparing versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a minimum 12 months' follow-up study.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Nardelli F; Ghezzi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 24552894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.
Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao MM; Cibula D; Wu X; Falconer H; Persson J; Perrotta M; Mosgaard BJ; Kucukmetin A; Berlev I; Rendon G; Liu K; Vieira M; Capilna ME; Fotopoulou C; Baiocchi G; Kaidarova D; Ribeiro R; Pedra-Nobre S; Kocian R; Li X; Li J; Pálsdóttir K; Noll F; Rundle S; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Gheorghe M; Saso S; Bolatbekova R; Tsunoda A; Pitcher B; Wu J; Urbauer D; Pareja R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):97.e1-97.e16. PubMed ID: 34461074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy after preoperative brachytherapy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: feasibility, results, and surgical implications in a large bicentric study of 162 consecutive cases.
Uzan C; Merlot B; Gouy S; Belghiti J; Haie-Meder C; Nickers P; Fabrice N; Morice P; Leblanc E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 22932859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival after Laparoscopic versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Campos LS; Limberger LF; Stein AT; Caldas JM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Jan; 22(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 33507684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
Campos LS; Limberger LF; Stein AT; Kalil AN
Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():293. PubMed ID: 24028441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Kim S; Min KJ; Lee S; Hong JH; Song JY; Lee JK; Lee NW
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 32467009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
