212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32891646)
1. The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.
Mitchell AG; Harris JM; Benstock SE; Ales JM
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107618. PubMed ID: 32891646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On line bisection: Validity and reliability of online measures of pseudoneglect.
Mitchell AG; Kandt PO; McIntosh RD
Laterality; 2022 Jul; 27(4):443-466. PubMed ID: 35940957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults.
Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tactile rod bisection in the absence of visuo-spatial processing in children, mid-age and older adults.
Brooks JL; Della Sala S; Logie RH
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3392-8. PubMed ID: 21875610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial asymmetries ("pseudoneglect") in free visual exploration-modulation of age and relationship to line bisection.
Chiffi K; Diana L; Hartmann M; Cazzoli D; Bassetti CL; Müri RM; Eberhard-Moscicka AK
Exp Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 239(9):2693-2700. PubMed ID: 34218299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced Pseudoneglect for Physical Space, but not Mental Representations of Space, for Adults with Autistic Traits.
English MCW; Maybery MT; Visser TAW
J Autism Dev Disord; 2017 Jul; 47(7):1956-1965. PubMed ID: 28374209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
McCourt ME; Jewell G
Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Meta-Analysis of Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance in Older Adults.
Learmonth G; Papadatou-Pastou M
Neuropsychol Rev; 2022 Jun; 32(2):438-457. PubMed ID: 33890188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eye dominance modulates visuospatial attention.
Schintu S; Chaumillon R; Guillaume A; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107314. PubMed ID: 31870684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pseudoneglect in solid-line versus character-line bisection tasks: a test for attention dominance theory.
Lee BH; Kim M; Kang SJ; Park KC; Kim EJ; Adair JC; Na DL
Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Sep; 17(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 15536305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Putts that get missed on the right: investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf.
Roberts R; Turnbull OH
J Sports Sci; 2010 Feb; 28(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 20155570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial biases in peripersonal space in sighted and blind individuals revealed by a haptic line bisection paradigm.
Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Tinti C; Pascual-Leone A; Silvanto J; Vecchi T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1110-21. PubMed ID: 21517214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
