These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32892180)

  • 1. Evaluation of the labour process with serial transperineal ultrasonography and prediction of the type of birth.
    Bulut AN; Ceyhan V
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Sep; 49(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 32892180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different methods of measuring angle of progression in prediction of labor outcome.
    Frick A; Kostiv V; Vojtassakova D; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 31692170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor.
    Chan VYT; Lau WL; So MKP; Leung WC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 144(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 30430566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time remaining in labor and probability of vaginal delivery as a function of the angle of progression in a low risk population with a normal first stage of labor. In-house observational study and comparison with the data in the literature.
    Masturzo B; Piazzese A; Paracchini S; Quezada MS; Todros T; Farina A
    Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Feb; 70(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28590104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
    Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
    Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.
    Eggebø TM; Hassan WA; Salvesen KÅ; Lindtjørn E; Lees CC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 24105705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?
    Levy R; Zaks S; Ben-Arie A; Perlman S; Hagay Z; Vaisbuch E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 22605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can assessing the angle of progression before labor onset assist to predict vaginal birth after cesarean?: A prospective cohort observational study.
    Gillor M; Levy R; Barak O; Ben Arie A; Vaisbuch E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jun; 35(11):2046-2053. PubMed ID: 32519917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography.
    Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(14):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31505974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of labor outcome using serial transperineal ultrasound in the first stage of labor.
    Chor CM; Poon LCY; Leung TY
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Jan; 32(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 28819985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
    Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transperineal ultrasound assessment of maternal pelvic floor at term and fetal head engagement.
    Youssef A; Brunelli E; Montaguti E; Di Donna G; Dodaro MG; Bianchini L; Pilu G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 56(6):921-927. PubMed ID: 31975450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor.
    Brunelli E; Youssef A; Soliman EM; Del Prete B; Mahmoud MH; Fikry M; Pilu G; Kamel RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):81.e1-81.e9. PubMed ID: 33508312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
    Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy.
    Kamel RA; Negm SM; Youssef A; Bianchini L; Brunelli E; Pilu G; Soliman M; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):609.e1-609.e11. PubMed ID: 33412128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Angle of progression measured using transperineal ultrasound for prediction of uncomplicated operative vaginal delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nassr AA; Hessami K; Berghella V; Bibbo C; Shamshirsaz AA; Shirdel Abdolmaleki A; Marsoosi V; Clark SL; Belfort MA; Shamshirsaz AA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 60(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 35238424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of the angle of progression in labor using parasagittal approach versus midsagittal approach.
    Kamel R; Negm S; Montaguti E; Dodaro MG; Brunelli E; Di Donna G; Soliman E; Sharaf MF; ElHarty AS; Youssef A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Oct; 34(19):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 31640437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of mode of delivery by an ultrasound score similar to Bishop score and performance of independent predictors.
    Manchu M; Redla V
    J Ultrasound; 2023 Sep; 26(3):619-626. PubMed ID: 35622298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
    Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.