BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32893029)

  • 1. Survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer treated with open versus robotic radical hysterectomy: Our surgical pathology interrogation.
    Yang J; Mead-Harvey C; Polen-De C; Magtibay P; Butler K; Cliby W; Langstraat C; Dinh T; Chen L; Magrina J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32893029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study.
    Alfonzo E; Wallin E; Ekdahl L; Staf C; Rådestad AF; Reynisson P; Stålberg K; Falconer H; Persson J; Dahm-Kähler P
    Eur J Cancer; 2019 Jul; 116():169-177. PubMed ID: 31200323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carcinomatosis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treated with Robotic Radical Hysterectomy: Recurrence Patterns, Risk Factors, and Survival.
    Fitzsimmons CK; Stephens AJ; Kennard JA; Manyam M; Pepe JW; Ahmad S; McKenzie ND; Kendrick JE; Holloway RW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):2006-2013. PubMed ID: 34757549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
    Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
    J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study.
    Eoh KJ; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32093687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
    Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
    Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.
    Kwon BS; Roh HJ; Lee S; Yang J; Song YJ; Lee SH; Kim KH; Suh DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):642-648. PubMed ID: 33041070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-centre experience from India.
    Sekhon R; Naithani A; Makkar P; R P; Sharma P; Rawal S; Goyal Y; Mitra S; Sharma A; Mehta A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):935-941. PubMed ID: 34709536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The early surgical period in robotic radical hysterectomy is related to the recurrence after surgery in stage IB cervical cancer.
    Paek J; Lim PC
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(12):2697-2704. PubMed ID: 34104102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.
    Liu CH; Lee YC; Lin JC; Chan IS; Lee NR; Chang WH; Liu WM; Wang PH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31614465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.