These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography derived from low-dose dynamic CT myocardial perfusion: a feasibility study with comparison to invasive coronary angiography. Dai X; Yu M; Pan J; Lu Z; Shen C; Wang Y; Lu B; Zhang J Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4349-4356. PubMed ID: 30413956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporary Discrepancies of Stenosis Assessment by Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography. Song YB; Arbab-Zadeh A; Matheson MB; Ostovaneh MR; Vavere AL; Dewey M; Rochitte C; Niinuma H; Laham R; Schuijf JD; Cox C; Brinker J; di Carli M; Lima JAC; Miller JM Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007720. PubMed ID: 30764641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial. Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of static single-scan stress perfusion cardiac computed tomography in detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with combined invasive coronary angiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-myocardial perfusion imaging. Song I; Yi JG; Park JH; Kim MY; Shin JK; Ko SM Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 29320864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease. Coenen A; Rossi A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono AK; Chelu RG; Segreto S; Dijkshoorn ML; Wragg A; van Geuns RM; Pugliese F; Nieman K JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 10(7):760-770. PubMed ID: 28109933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. Nasis A; Ko BS; Leung MC; Antonis PR; Nandurkar D; Wong DT; Kyi L; Cameron JD; Troupis JM; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1812-21. PubMed ID: 23430194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol. Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography With Selective PET Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease. Maaniitty T; Stenström I; Bax JJ; Uusitalo V; Ukkonen H; Kajander S; Mäki M; Saraste A; Knuuti J JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1361-1370. PubMed ID: 28528146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. Ho KT; Chua KC; Klotz E; Panknin C JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Aug; 3(8):811-20. PubMed ID: 20705260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Acquired Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease. Arbab-Zadeh A; Di Carli MF; Cerci R; George RT; Chen MY; Dewey M; Niinuma H; Vavere AL; Betoko A; Plotkin M; Cox C; Clouse ME; Arai AE; Rochitte CE; Lima JA; Brinker J; Miller JM Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 8(10):e003533. PubMed ID: 26467105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance of Functional SYNTAX Score Derived From Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Dai X; Yu L; Yu Y; Yang W; Lan Z; Yuan J; Yang W; Zhang J Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Apr; 17(4):e016155. PubMed ID: 38626098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison between 320-MDCT and rubidium-82 PET. Dantas RN; Assuncao AN; Marques IA; Fahel MG; Nomura CH; Avila LFR; Giorgi MCP; Soares J; Meneghetti JC; Parga JR Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2665-2674. PubMed ID: 29352381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis. Rizvi A; Han D; Danad I; Ó Hartaigh B; Lee JH; Gransar H; Stuijfzand WJ; Roudsari HM; Park MW; Szymonifka J; Chang HJ; Jones EC; Knaapen P; Lin FY; Min JK; Peña JM JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 11(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 28823745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additional diagnostic value of first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging without stress when combined with 64-row detector coronary CT angiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Osawa K; Miyoshi T; Koyama Y; Hashimoto K; Sato S; Nakamura K; Nishii N; Kohno K; Morita H; Kanazawa S; Ito H Heart; 2014 Jul; 100(13):1008-15. PubMed ID: 24763490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]