These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32894341)
1. Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study. Littman R; Kalanthroff E Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2420-2427. PubMed ID: 32894341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neutral affordances: Task conflict in the affordances task. Littman R; Kalanthroff E Conscious Cogn; 2022 Jan; 97():103262. PubMed ID: 34923242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Task Conflict and Task Control: A Mini-Review. Littman R; Keha E; Kalanthroff E Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1598. PubMed ID: 31379659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resting Stroop task: Evidence of task conflict in trials with no required response. Hershman R; Dadon G; Kiesel A; Henik A Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):353-360. PubMed ID: 37620635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The contribution of meaning to the detection of task conflict. Hershman R; Levin Y; Tzelgov J; Henik A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Sep; 74(9):1553-1561. PubMed ID: 33629642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict. Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect. Henkin Y; Yaar-Soffer Y; Gilat S; Muchnik C J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):474-86. PubMed ID: 20807483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference. Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Task and information conflicts in the numerical Stroop task. Hershman R; Beckmann L; Henik A Psychophysiology; 2022 Sep; 59(9):e14057. PubMed ID: 35353908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of frontopolar cortex in the individual differences in conflict adaptation. Lee Y; Kim C Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jul; 705():212-218. PubMed ID: 31054332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect. Entel O; Tzelgov J Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 27915364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflict modification: predictable production of congruent situations facilitates responding in a stroop task. Schmidts C; Foerster A; Kunde W Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1722-1732. PubMed ID: 29679142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation. Kalanthroff E; Henik A Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 23416541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes. Spinelli G; Lupker SJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1259-1286. PubMed ID: 38691237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks. Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is word? The boundary conditions of task conflict in the Stroop task. Keha E; Kalanthroff E Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1208-1218. PubMed ID: 36109353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliable affordances: A generative modeling approach for test-retest reliability of the affordances task. Littman R; Hochman S; Kalanthroff E Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1984-1993. PubMed ID: 37127802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Both task-irrelevant and task-relevant information trigger reactive conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion-congruent paradigm. Spinelli G; Morton JB; Lupker SJ Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2133-2145. PubMed ID: 35768659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect. Spinelli G; Lupker SJ Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]