These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32894402)
1. Uncertainty promotes information-seeking actions, but what information? Keller AM; Taylor HA; Brunyé TT Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Sep; 5(1):42. PubMed ID: 32894402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of learning and environmental geometry in landmark-based spatial reorientation of fish (Xenotoca eiseni). Sovrano VA; Baratti G; Lee SA PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229608. PubMed ID: 32126075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Where did it come from, where do you go? Direction sources influence navigation decisions during spatial uncertainty. Brunyé TT; Gagnon SA; Gardony AL; Gopal N; Holmes A; Taylor HA; Tenbrink T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):585-607. PubMed ID: 25285995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential navigational strategies during spatial learning in a new modified version of the Oasis maze. Concha-Miranda M; More J; Grinspun N; Sanchez C; Paula-Lima A; Valdés JL Behav Brain Res; 2020 May; 385():112555. PubMed ID: 32109438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Representation of human spatial navigation responding to input spatial information and output navigational strategies: An ALE meta-analysis. Qiu Y; Wu Y; Liu R; Wang J; Huang H; Huang R Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2019 Aug; 103():60-72. PubMed ID: 31201830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Secondary Motor Cortex Transforms Spatial Information into Planned Action during Navigation. Olson JM; Li JK; Montgomery SE; Nitz DA Curr Biol; 2020 May; 30(10):1845-1854.e4. PubMed ID: 32302586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Encoding and retrieval of landmark-related spatial cues during navigation: an fMRI study. Wegman J; Tyborowska A; Janzen G Hippocampus; 2014 Jul; 24(7):853-68. PubMed ID: 24706395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of orientation change during environmental learning on age-related difference in spatial memory. Yamamoto N; Fox MJ; Boys E; Ord J Behav Brain Res; 2019 Jun; 365():125-132. PubMed ID: 30851314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Introducing a new age-and-cognition-sensitive measurement for assessing spatial orientation using a landmark-less virtual reality navigational task. Ranjbar Pouya O; Byagowi A; Kelly DM; Moussavi Z Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1406-1419. PubMed ID: 27156658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks. Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism? König SU; Goeke C; Meilinger T; König P Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):498-513. PubMed ID: 28770385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The developmental trajectory of intramaze and extramaze landmark biases in spatial navigation: An unexpected journey. Buckley MG; Haselgrove M; Smith AD Dev Psychol; 2015 Jun; 51(6):771-91. PubMed ID: 25844850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]