These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32895024)

  • 1. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity?
    Zhou N; Dixon S; Zhu Z; Dong L; Weiner M
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520948385. PubMed ID: 32895024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectrotemporal Modulation Discrimination in Infants With Normal Hearing.
    Noble AR; Resnick J; Broncheau M; Klotz S; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA; Horn DL
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 36218270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Won JH; Moon IJ; Jin S; Park H; Woo J; Cho YS; Chung WH; Hong SH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140920. PubMed ID: 26485715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.
    Anderson ES; Oxenham AJ; Nelson PB; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3925-34. PubMed ID: 23231122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaction Time Sensitivity to Spectrotemporal Modulations of Sound.
    Veugen LCE; van Opstal AJ; van Wanrooij MM
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221127589. PubMed ID: 36172759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
    Mehraei G; Gallun FJ; Leek MR; Bernstein JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distortion of Spectral Ripples Through Cochlear Implants Has Major Implications for Interpreting Performance Scores.
    Winn MB; O'Brien G
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):764-772. PubMed ID: 34966157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychoacoustic and Demographic Factors for Speech Recognition of Older Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Luo X; Kolberg C; Pulling KR; Azuma T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jun; 63(6):1712-1725. PubMed ID: 32501736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a Tool for Measuring Temporal Modulation Detection.
    Landsberger DM; Stupak N
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):448-459. PubMed ID: 34380982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech: Amplitude Modulation Versus Amplitude Plus Frequency Modulation.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 31246660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 17587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.
    Miller CW; Bernstein JGW; Zhang X; Wu YH; Bentler RA; Tremblay K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 61(12):3113-3126. PubMed ID: 30515519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    O'Neill ER; Parke MN; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1224. PubMed ID: 33639827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of aging on speech perception in noise: comparison between normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C; Sladen DP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(7):656-65. PubMed ID: 25365368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Fu QJ; Wei CG; Cao KL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):957-70. PubMed ID: 18818548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.