189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32896507)
1. Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction.
Bamdad S; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Abdolahian M; Piñero DP
J Optom; 2022; 15(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32896507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noncycloplegic Compared with Cycloplegic Refraction in a Chicago School-Aged Population.
Guo X; Shakarchi AF; Block SS; Friedman DS; Repka MX; Collins ME
Ophthalmology; 2022 Jul; 129(7):813-820. PubMed ID: 35245603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.
He M; Congdon N; MacKenzie G; Zeng Y; Silver JD; Ellwein L
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21232802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction: the Tehran Eye Study.
Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Soroush S; Yekta A; Dadbin N; Fotouhi A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 100(8):1122-7. PubMed ID: 26541436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized clinical trial using cyclopentolate and tropicamide to compare cycloplegic refraction in Chinese young adults with dark irises.
Pei R; Liu Z; Rong H; Zhao L; Du B; Jin N; Zhang H; Wang B; Pang Y; Wei R
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):256. PubMed ID: 34112149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Refractive Accuracy and Visual Outcome by Self-Refraction Using Adjustable-Focus Spectacles in Young Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Zhao L; Wen Q; Nasrazadani D; Cheung NL; Weinert MC; Freedman SF; Silver J; Priestley YM; Congdon N; Prakalapakorn SG
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep; 141(9):853-860. PubMed ID: 37615952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability and validity of Zywave aberrometer measurements.
Hament WJ; Nabar VA; Nuijts RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Dec; 28(12):2135-41. PubMed ID: 12498848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.
Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 102(12):1717-1722. PubMed ID: 29439996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of photorefraction by Plusoptix A12 and cycloplegic autorefraction in children.
Ghadimi H; Nikdel M; Suh DW
BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):179. PubMed ID: 38641836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Method comparison and overview of refractive measurements in children: implications for myopia management.
Müller J; Chen X; Ohlendorf A; Li L; Wahl S
BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 38429067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.
Lin Z; Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Zhou HJ; Mao GY; Wang NL; Liang YB
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 28503812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-Cycloplegic and Cycloplegic Autorefraction with Retinomax: An Agreement Study in Preschoolers in Los Angeles, California.
Margines JB; Yu F; Mehravaran S; Coleman AL
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 30(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 36168672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Sankara Nethralaya Tamil Nadu Essilor Myopia (STEM) Study-Defining a Threshold for Non-Cycloplegic Myopia Prevalence in Children.
Gopalakrishnan A; Hussaindeen JR; Sivaraman V; Swaminathan M; Wong YL; Armitage JA; Gentle A; Backhouse S
J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 33804031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of refractive measurement of wavefront autorefraction in patients with difficult retinoscopy.
Kinori M; Gomi CF; Ondeck CL; Schanzlin DJ; Robbins SL; Granet DB
J AAPOS; 2016 Dec; 20(6):493-495.e1. PubMed ID: 27815189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopy in Indian children.
Guha S; Shah S; Shah K; Hurakadli P; Majee D; Gandhi S
Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Jan; 100(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 27426488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction in primary school children in southern Thailand.
Funarunart P; Tengtrisorn S; Sangsupawanich P; Siangyai P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 19530586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
