These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32896634)

  • 1. A methodological framework for inverse-modeling of propagating cortical activity using MEG/EEG.
    Hindriks R
    Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117345. PubMed ID: 32896634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
    Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
    Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
    Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive cortical parcellations for source reconstructed EEG/MEG connectomes.
    Farahibozorg SR; Henson RN; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():23-45. PubMed ID: 28893608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
    Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
    Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial filter approach for comparison of the forward and inverse problems of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Bradshaw LA; Wijesinghe RS; Wikswo JP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Mar; 29(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 11310783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of spatial pattern scale of brain activity on the sensitivity of DOT, fMRI, EEG and MEG.
    Perdue KL; Diamond SG
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83299. PubMed ID: 24376684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sparse weightings for collapsing inverse solutions to cortical parcellations optimize M/EEG source reconstruction accuracy.
    Korhonen O; Palva S; Palva JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():147-160. PubMed ID: 24509129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
    Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the EEG/MEG forward problem solution for distributed cortical sources.
    von Ellenrieder N; Valdés-Hernández PA; Muravchik CH
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1083-91. PubMed ID: 19730912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Divergent cortical generators of MEG and EEG during human sleep spindles suggested by distributed source modeling.
    Dehghani N; Cash SS; Chen CC; Hagler DJ; Huang M; Dale AM; Halgren E
    PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11454. PubMed ID: 20628643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coupling of gamma band activity to sleep spindle oscillations - a combined EEG/MEG study.
    Weber FD; Supp GG; Klinzing JG; Mölle M; Engel AK; Born J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117452. PubMed ID: 33059050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.