These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32896922)

  • 1. Splitting event-related potentials: Modeling latent components using regression-based waveform estimation.
    Brouwer H; Delogu F; Crocker MW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 53(4):974-995. PubMed ID: 32896922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When components collide: Spatiotemporal overlap of the N400 and P600 in language comprehension.
    Delogu F; Brouwer H; Crocker MW
    Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 1766():147514. PubMed ID: 33974906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: II. Nonlinear effects, overlap correction, and practical considerations.
    Smith NJ; Kutas M
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Feb; 52(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 25195691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: I. The rERP framework.
    Smith NJ; Kutas M
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Feb; 52(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 25141770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing.
    Tanner D; Van Hell JG
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():289-301. PubMed ID: 24530237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension.
    Delogu F; Brouwer H; Crocker MW
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103569. PubMed ID: 31202158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust neurocognitive individual differences in grammatical agreement processing: A latent variable approach.
    Tanner D
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():210-237. PubMed ID: 30508679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Principle ERP reduction and analysis: Estimating and using principle ERP waveforms underlying ERPs across tasks, subjects and electrodes.
    Campos E; Hazlett C; Tan P; Truong H; Loo S; DiStefano C; Jeste S; Şentürk D
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 212():116630. PubMed ID: 32087372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Language ERPs reflect learning through prediction error propagation.
    Fitz H; Chang F
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Jun; 111():15-52. PubMed ID: 30921626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decomposing stimulus and response component waveforms in ERP.
    Zhang J
    J Neurosci Methods; 1998 Mar; 80(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 9606050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing.
    Brouwer H; Crocker MW; Venhuizen NJ; Hoeks JCJ
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6(Suppl Suppl 6):1318-1352. PubMed ID: 28000963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First Language Attrition Induces Changes in Online Morphosyntactic Processing and Re-Analysis: An ERP Study of Number Agreement in Complex Italian Sentences.
    Kasparian K; Vespignani F; Steinhauer K
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Sep; 41(7):1760-1803. PubMed ID: 27868225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time is of the Essence: A Review of Electroencephalography (EEG) and Event-Related Brain Potentials (ERPs) in Language Research.
    Beres AM
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2017 Dec; 42(4):247-255. PubMed ID: 28698970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatiotemporal analysis of experimental differences in event-related potential data with partial least squares.
    Lobaugh NJ; West R; McIntosh AR
    Psychophysiology; 2001 May; 38(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11352141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuroanatomic localization of priming effects for famous faces with latency-corrected event-related potentials.
    Kashyap R; Ouyang G; Sommer W; Zhou C
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1632():58-72. PubMed ID: 26683085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of semantic and syntactic event related potentials generated by children and adults.
    Atchley RA; Rice ML; Betz SK; Kwasny KM; Sereno JA; Jongman A
    Brain Lang; 2006 Dec; 99(3):236-46. PubMed ID: 16226804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural bases of cognitive ERPs: more than phase reset.
    Fell J; Dietl T; Grunwald T; Kurthen M; Klaver P; Trautner P; Schaller C; Elger CE; Fernández G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1595-604. PubMed ID: 15601521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potentials of the brain and cognitive processes: approaches and applications.
    Brandeis D; Lehmann D
    Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(1):151-68. PubMed ID: 3703232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.
    Payne BR; Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1456-69. PubMed ID: 26311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing.
    Taylor BK; Gavin WJ; Grimm KJ; Prince MA; Lin MH; Davies PL
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107128. PubMed ID: 31229538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.