126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32897953)
1. Impact of Ki-67 Labeling Index on Prognostic Significance of the Chemotherapy Response Score in Women With Tubo-ovarian Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Heayn M; Skvarca LB; Zhu L; Edwards RP; Olawaiye AB; Modugno F; Elishaev E; Bhargava R
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2021 May; 40(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 32897953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Cohen PA; Powell A; Böhm S; Gilks CB; Stewart CJR; Meniawy TM; Bulsara M; Avril S; Brockbank EC; Bosse T; de Azevedo Focchi GR; Ganesan R; Glasspool RM; Howitt BE; Kim HS; Lee JY; Le ND; Lockley M; Manchanda R; Mandalia T; McCluggage WG; McNeish I; Midha D; Srinivasan R; Tan YY; van der Griend R; Yunokawa M; Zannoni GF; ; Singh N
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31118141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External validation of chemotherapy response score system for histopathological assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.
Lee JY; Chung YS; Na K; Kim HM; Park CK; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT; Kim HS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e73. PubMed ID: 28758379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External validation of a 'response score' after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response.
Zorzato PC; Zannoni GF; Tudisco R; Pasciuto T; Di Giorgio A; Franchi M; Scambia G; Fagotti A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 31754067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemotherapy response score as a prognostic tool in patients with advanced stage endometrial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Jani I; Lastra RR; Brito KS; Liao C; Lazo I; Lee NK; Yamada SD; Kurnit KC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jun; 31(6):852-858. PubMed ID: 33833085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.
Böhm S; Faruqi A; Said I; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Jeyarajah A; Fitzpatrick A; Ennis D; Dowe T; Santos JL; Cook LS; Tinker AV; Le ND; Gilks CB; Singh N
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2457-63. PubMed ID: 26124480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Role of Histological Tumor Regression in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Grade Serous Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma.
Coghlan E; Meniawy TM; Munro A; Bulsara M; Stewart CJ; Tan A; Koay MHE; MaGee D; Codde J; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Leung Y; Nichols CB; Cohen PA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 28441251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathologic chemotherapy response score in epithelial ovarian cancer: Surgical, genetic, and survival considerations.
Barrington DA; Felix AS; Owda R; Suarez AA; Cohen DW; Senter L; Copeland LJ; Fowler JM; Backes FJ; Cohn DE; Bixel KL; O'Malley DM; Salani R; Cosgrove CM
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():40-45. PubMed ID: 32891351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials.
Vergote I; Coens C; Nankivell M; Kristensen GB; Parmar MKB; Ehlen T; Jayson GC; Johnson N; Swart AM; Verheijen R; McCluggage WG; Perren T; Panici PB; Kenter G; Casado A; Mendiola C; Stuart G; Reed NS; Kehoe S; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1680-1687. PubMed ID: 30413383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of a Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) System for Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma (HGSC).
Ditzel HM; Strickland KC; Meserve EE; Stover E; Konstantinopoulos PA; Matulonis UA; Muto MG; Liu JF; Feltmate C; Horowitz N; Berkowitz RS; Gupta M; Hecht JL; Lin DI; Jochumsen KM; Welch WR; Hirsch MS; Quade BJ; Lee KR; Crum CP; Mutter GL; Nucci MR; Howitt BE
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2019 May; 38(3):230-240. PubMed ID: 29750700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a prognostic biomarker in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: updated Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) results.
Böhm S; Le N; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Faruqi A; Said I; Jeyarajah A; Wuntakal R; Gilks B; Singh N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Feb; 29(2):353-356. PubMed ID: 30683759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking surgery and survival in ovarian cancer.
Liu YL; Zhou QC; Iasonos A; Filippova OT; Chi DS; Zivanovic O; Sonoda Y; Gardner G; Broach V; OCearbhaill R; Konner JA; Aghajanian CA; Long K; Tew W
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Oct; 30(10):1554-1561. PubMed ID: 32522770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment strategies for patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: interval debulking surgery or additional chemotherapy?
Yoneoka Y; Ishikawa M; Uehara T; Shimizu H; Uno M; Murakami T; Kato T
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30(5):e81. PubMed ID: 31328461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy: evaluation of chemotherapy response score and serological and/or radiological assessment of response in ovarian cancer patients.
Ramspott JP; Baert T; MacKintosh ML; Traut A; Ataseven B; Bommert M; Heitz F; Plett H; Schneider S; Waltering KU; Heikaus S; Harter P; du Bois A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 304(4):1021-1032. PubMed ID: 33661392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic implications of histological tumor regression (Böhm's score) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade serous tubal & ovarian carcinoma.
Rajkumar S; Polson A; Nath R; Lane G; Sayasneh A; Jakes A; Begum S; Mehra G
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 151(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30197060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Liontos M; Andrikopoulou A; Koutsoukos K; Markellos C; Skafida E; Fiste O; Kaparelou M; Thomakos N; Haidopoulos D; Rodolakis A; Dimopoulos MA; Zagouri F
J Ovarian Res; 2021 Nov; 14(1):148. PubMed ID: 34724958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The chemotherapy response score is a useful histological predictor of prognosis in high-grade serous carcinoma.
Singh P; Kaushal V; Rai B; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Dey P; Garg R; Rohilla M; Suri V; Ghoshal S; Srinivasan R
Histopathology; 2018 Mar; 72(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 28914967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of Chemotherapy Response Score with Multidrug Resistance 1 and CA125 ELIMination Rate Constant K in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Matsukuma K; Nishio S; Tasaki S; Park J; Nasu H; Yoshimitsu T; Tasaki K; Katsuda T; Terada A; Tsuda N; Sanada S; Ushijima K
Kurume Med J; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38556270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal primary management of bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma: Are the only options complete gross resection at primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
Sioulas VD; Schiavone MB; Kadouri D; Zivanovic O; Roche KL; O'Cearbhaill R; Abu-Rustum NR; Levine DA; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Leitao MM; Chi DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28238354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel classification of residual disease after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer to better distinguish oncologic outcome.
Manning-Geist BL; Hicks-Courant K; Gockley AA; Clark RM; Del Carmen MG; Growdon WB; Horowitz NS; Berkowitz RS; Muto MG; Worley MJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):326.e1-326.e7. PubMed ID: 31082382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
