These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32898190)

  • 1. Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal's perspective.
    Meyer N; Kröger M; Thümmler J; Tietze L; Palme R; Touma C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238895. PubMed ID: 32898190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of sublingual, facial and retro-bulbar blood sampling in mice in relation to animal welfare and blood quality.
    Gjendal K; Kiersgaard MK; Abelson K; Sørensen DB; Ottesen JL
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2020; 103():106680. PubMed ID: 32057916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of various methods of blood sampling in mice and rats: Effects on animal welfare.
    Harikrishnan VS; Hansen AK; Abelson KS; Sørensen DB
    Lab Anim; 2018 Jun; 52(3):253-264. PubMed ID: 29165033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of different blood collection methods on indicators of welfare in mice.
    Tsai PP; Schlichtig A; Ziegler E; Ernst H; Haberstroh J; Stelzer HD; Hackbarth H
    Lab Anim (NY); 2015 Aug; 44(8):301-10. PubMed ID: 26200084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-dependent Pathologic and Inflammatory Consequences of Various Blood Sampling Techniques in Mice.
    Sørensen DB; Metzdorff SB; Jensen LK; Andersen KH; Teilmann AC; Jensen HE; Frøkiaer H
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2019 May; 58(3):362-372. PubMed ID: 30947767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiological and pathological impact of blood sampling by retro-bulbar sinus puncture and facial vein phlebotomy in laboratory mice.
    Teilmann AC; Nygaard Madsen A; Holst B; Hau J; Rozell B; Abelson KS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113225. PubMed ID: 25426941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acclimation and Blood Sampling: Effects on Stress Markers in C57Bl/6J Mice.
    Marin N; Moragon A; Gil D; Garcia-Garcia F; Bisbal V
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 37760216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The grimace scale: a useful tool for assessing pain in laboratory animals.
    Onuma K; Watanabe M; Sasaki N
    Exp Anim; 2024 Jul; 73(3):234-245. PubMed ID: 38382945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of blood sampling technique on blood quality and animal welfare in haemophilic mice.
    Holmberg H; Kiersgaard MK; Mikkelsen LF; Tranholm M
    Lab Anim; 2011 Apr; 45(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 21382833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of clinical pathology parameters with two different blood sampling techniques in rats: retrobulbar plexus versus sublingual vein.
    Mahl A; Heining P; Ulrich P; Jakubowski J; Bobadilla M; Zeller W; Bergmann R; Singer T; Meister L
    Lab Anim; 2000 Oct; 34(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 11072855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of ACTH and corticosterone sampling methods in rats.
    Vahl TP; Ulrich-Lai YM; Ostrander MM; Dolgas CM; Elfers EE; Seeley RJ; D'Alessio DA; Herman JP
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2005 Nov; 289(5):E823-8. PubMed ID: 15956051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects on animal wellbeing and sample quality of 2 techniques for collecting blood from the facial vein of mice.
    Francisco CC; Howarth GS; Whittaker AL
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2015 Jan; 54(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 25651095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sublingual and submandibular blood collection in mice: a comparison of effects on body weight, food consumption and tissue damage.
    Heimann M; Roth DR; Ledieu D; Pfister R; Classen W
    Lab Anim; 2010 Oct; 44(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 20696790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice-based severity scale (CSS): assessing the relative severity of procedures from a laboratory animal's perspective.
    Cassidy L; Treue S; Gail A; Pfefferle D
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17300. PubMed ID: 38903880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Serial Blood Collection by Facial Vein and Retrobulbar Methods in C57BL/6 Mice.
    Frohlich JR; Alarcón CN; Toarmino CR; Sunseri AK; Hockman TM
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2018 Jul; 57(4):382-391. PubMed ID: 29907166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical, Physiologic, and Behavioral Evaluation of Permanently Catheterized NMRI Mice.
    Falkenberg MK; Teilmann AC; Henriksen T; Hau J; Poulsen HE; Abelson KS
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2019 May; 58(3):380-389. PubMed ID: 30971326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based severity assessment: Impact of repeated versus single open-field testing on welfare in C57BL/6J mice.
    Bodden C; Siestrup S; Palme R; Kaiser S; Sachser N; Richter SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 336():261-268. PubMed ID: 28842269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a refined technique for taking repeated blood samples from juvenile and adult mice.
    Sadler AM; Bailey SJ
    Lab Anim; 2013 Oct; 47(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 23828854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of enhancing cage complexity on the behaviour and welfare of laboratory rats.
    Abou-Ismail UA; Burman OH; Nicol CJ; Mendl M
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 20637270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory routines cause animal stress.
    Balcombe JP; Barnard ND; Sandusky C
    Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 43(6):42-51. PubMed ID: 15669134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.