These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32898667)

  • 1. The potential for elegance in simplicity. A commentary on "One anastomosis-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional bariatric surgery after failed primary adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG): A systematic review of 1075 patients.".
    Yohann A; Charles A
    Int J Surg; 2020 Oct; 82():204-205. PubMed ID: 32898667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An invited commentary on: "One anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional bariatric surgery after failed primary adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG): A systematic review of 1075 patients" (international journal of surgery 2020;81:32-38).
    Abo-Ryia MH
    Int J Surg; 2020 Oct; 82():245-246. PubMed ID: 32920183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional bariatric surgery after failed primary adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG): A systematic review of 1075 patients.
    Parmar CD; Gan J; Stier C; Dong Z; Chiappetta S; El-Kadre L; Bashah MM; Wang C; Sakran N
    Int J Surg; 2020 Sep; 81():32-38. PubMed ID: 32738545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis-mini gastric bypass as a rescue procedure following failed restrictive bariatric surgery. A systematic review of literature with metanalysis.
    Velotti N; Vitiello A; Berardi G; Di Lauro K; Musella M
    Updates Surg; 2021 Apr; 73(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 33606148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission: the Role of Mini Gastric Bypass/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy at 1 Year of Follow-up. A European survey.
    Musella M; Apers J; Rheinwalt K; Ribeiro R; Manno E; Greco F; Čierny M; Milone M; Di Stefano C; Guler S; Van Lessen IM; Guerra A; Maglio MN; Bonfanti R; Novotna R; Coretti G; Piazza L
    Obes Surg; 2016 May; 26(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26341086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one anastomosis gastric bypass as rescue therapy after failed adjustable gastric banding: a multicenter comparative study.
    Pujol Rafols J; Al Abbas AI; Devriendt S; Guerra A; Herrera MF; Himpens J; Pardina E; Peinado-Onsurbe J; Ramos A; Ribeiro RJDS; Safadi B; Sanchez-Aguilar H; de Vries C; Van Wagensveld B
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Nov; 14(11):1659-1666. PubMed ID: 30236443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study.
    Musella M; Bruni V; Greco F; Raffaelli M; Lucchese M; Susa A; De Luca M; Vuolo G; Manno E; Vitiello A; Velotti N; D'Alessio R; Facchiano E; Tirone A; Iovino G; Veroux G; Piazza L
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Aug; 15(8):1332-1339. PubMed ID: 31272866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.
    Creange C; Jenkins M; Pergamo M; Fielding G; Ren-Fielding C; Schwack B
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Oct; 14(10):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 30449510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One Anastomosis/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) as Revisional Surgery Following Primary Restrictive Bariatric Procedures: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kermansaravi M; Shahmiri SS; DavarpanahJazi AH; Valizadeh R; Berardi G; Vitiello A; Musella M; Carbajo M
    Obes Surg; 2021 Jan; 31(1):370-383. PubMed ID: 33118133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB collaborative group.
    Hussain A; Van den Bossche M; Kerrigan DD; Alhamdani A; Parmar C; Javed S; Harper C; Darrien J; Singhal R; Yeluri S; Vasas P; Balchandra S; El-Hasani S
    Int J Surg; 2019 Sep; 69():13-18. PubMed ID: 31299430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Second Step Procedure After Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Chiappetta S; Stier C; Scheffel O; Squillante S; Weiner RA
    Obes Surg; 2019 Mar; 29(3):819-827. PubMed ID: 30542828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The first case report of failed single-anastomosis-duodeno-ileal bypass converted to One anastomosis gastric bypass/Mini-gastric bypass.
    Chiappetta S; Stier C; Scheffel O; Theodoridou S; Weiner R
    Int J Surg Case Rep; 2017; 35():68-72. PubMed ID: 28448862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in HOMA-IR index levels after bariatric surgery: Comparison of Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch-proximal approach (SADS-p) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB).
    Ozmen MM; Guldogan CE; Gundogdu E
    Int J Surg; 2020 Jun; 78():36-41. PubMed ID: 32305534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-stage conversions from failed gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from the United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgical Registry.
    Khan OA; McGlone ER; Maynard W; Hopkins J; Dexter S; Finlay I; Hewin D; Sedman P; Walton P; Somers S; Reddy M; Small P; Adamo M; Welbourn R
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Oct; 14(10):1516-1520. PubMed ID: 30077665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-Term Weight Loss Results, Remission of Comorbidities and Nutritional Deficiencies of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Type 2 Diabetic (T2D) Patients.
    Castro MJ; Jimenez JM; Carbajo MA; Lopez M; Cao MJ; Garcia S; Ruiz-Tovar J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33092117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein-Calorie Malnutrition Requiring Revisional Surgery after One-Anastomosis-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Case Series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS).
    Khalaj A; Kalantar Motamedi MA; Mousapour P; Valizadeh M; Barzin M
    Obes Surg; 2019 Jun; 29(6):1714-1720. PubMed ID: 30706320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy.
    Lee JH; Nguyen QN; Le QA
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2016 Jun; 12(5):997-1002. PubMed ID: 27220823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gastric Band Removal in Revisional Bariatric Surgery, One-Step Versus Two-Step: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Dang JT; Switzer NJ; Wu J; Gill RS; Shi X; Thereaux J; Birch DW; de Gara C; Karmali S
    Obes Surg; 2016 Apr; 26(4):866-73. PubMed ID: 26843080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications Following the Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB/OAGB): a Multi-institutional Survey on 2678 Patients with a Mid-term (5 Years) Follow-up.
    Musella M; Susa A; Manno E; De Luca M; Greco F; Raffaelli M; Cristiano S; Milone M; Bianco P; Vilardi A; Damiano I; Segato G; Pedretti L; Giustacchini P; Fico D; Veroux G; Piazza L
    Obes Surg; 2017 Nov; 27(11):2956-2967. PubMed ID: 28569357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metabolic comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass, single-anastomosis duodenal-switch, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and vertical sleeve gastrectomy in rat.
    Arble DM; Evers SS; Bozadjieva N; Frikke-Schmidt H; Myronovych A; Lewis A; Toure MH; Seeley RJ
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Dec; 14(12):1857-1867. PubMed ID: 30292648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.