These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32898812)

  • 1. Use of citric acid for reducing CH
    Im S; Mostafa A; Kim DH
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jan; 753():142080. PubMed ID: 32898812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of pig slurry acidification on methane emissions during storage and subsequent biogas production.
    Shin SR; Im S; Mostafa A; Lee MK; Yun YM; Oh SE; Kim DH
    Water Res; 2019 Apr; 152():234-240. PubMed ID: 30677634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of H
    Im S; Mostafa A; Shin SR; Kim DH
    J Hazard Mater; 2020 Nov; 399():123063. PubMed ID: 32512282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic temperature rise in the manure storage tank increases methane emissions: Worth to cool down!
    Im S; Mostafa A; Lim KH; Kim I; Kim DH
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 823():153533. PubMed ID: 35150964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of storage temperature on CH
    Im S; Petersen SO; Lee D; Kim DH
    Waste Manag; 2020 Jan; 101():35-43. PubMed ID: 31586875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of reverse osmosis concentrate for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from pig slurry.
    Im S; Kang S; Jang D; Kim G; Kim DH
    Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1180018. PubMed ID: 37266025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from pig slurry by acidification with organic and inorganic acids.
    Dalby FR; Guldberg LB; Feilberg A; Kofoed MVW
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267693. PubMed ID: 35511811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biological degradation and greenhouse gas emissions during pre-storage of liquid animal manure.
    Møller HB; Sommer SG; Ahring BK
    J Environ Qual; 2004; 33(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 14964355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose-dependent effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate and hydrogen peroxide treatments on methane emission from pig manure during storage.
    Ambrose HW; Dalby FR; Feilberg A; Wegener Kofoed MV
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Jul; 364():121415. PubMed ID: 38865919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acidification of slurry to reduce ammonia and methane emissions: Deployment of a retrofittable system in fattening pig barns.
    Overmeyer V; Trimborn M; Clemens J; Hölscher R; Büscher W
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Apr; 331():117263. PubMed ID: 36669315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methane emission during on-site pre-storage of animal manure prior to anaerobic digestion at biogas plant: Effect of storage temperature and addition of food waste.
    Feng L; Ward AJ; Moset V; Møller HB
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 225():272-279. PubMed ID: 30098493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In-vitro method and model to estimate methane emissions from liquid manure management on pig and dairy farms in four countries.
    Petersen SO; Ma C; Hilgert JE; Mjöfors K; Sefeedpari P; Amon B; Aarnink A; Francó B; Dragoni F; Groenestein K; Gyldenkærne S; Herrmann C; Hutchings NJ; Kristensen IS; Liu J; Olesen JE; Rodhe L
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 353():120233. PubMed ID: 38330838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of slurry removal frequency on CH
    Feng L; Bonne Guldberg L; Jørgen Hansen M; Ma C; Vinther Ohrt R; Bjarne Møller H
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jul; 149():199-206. PubMed ID: 35752107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of different treatments of manure on mitigating methane emissions during storage and preserving the methane potential for anaerobic digestion.
    Ólafsdóttir SS; Jensen CD; Lymperatou A; Henriksen UB; Gavala HN
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116456. PubMed ID: 36270124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Slurry Storage: Impacts of Temperature and Potential Mitigation through Covering (Pig Slurry) or Acidification (Cattle Slurry).
    Misselbrook T; Hunt J; Perazzolo F; Provolo G
    J Environ Qual; 2016 Sep; 45(5):1520-1530. PubMed ID: 27695736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of Methane Emissions from Slurry Pits below Pig and Cattle Confinements.
    Petersen SO; Olsen AB; Elsgaard L; Triolo JM; Sommer SG
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160968. PubMed ID: 27529692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of temperature on continuous dry fermentation of swine manure.
    Deng L; Chen C; Zheng D; Yang H; Liu Y; Chen Z
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jul; 177():247-52. PubMed ID: 27107950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dairy manure acidification reduces CH4 emissions over short and long-term.
    Sokolov VK; VanderZaag A; Habtewold J; Dunfield K; Wagner-Riddle C; Venkiteswaran JJ; Crolla A; Gordon R
    Environ Technol; 2021 Jul; 42(18):2797-2804. PubMed ID: 31920167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental implications of stored cattle slurry treatment with sulphuric acid and biochar: A life cycle assessment approach.
    Miranda C; Soares AS; Coelho AC; Trindade H; Teixeira CA
    Environ Res; 2021 Mar; 194():110640. PubMed ID: 33358870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequent export of pig slurry for outside storage reduced methane but not ammonia emissions in cold and warm seasons.
    Ma C; Guldberg LB; Hansen MJ; Feng L; Petersen SO
    Waste Manag; 2023 Sep; 169():223-231. PubMed ID: 37459826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.