359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32899562)
21. Impact of industrial agglomeration on environmental pollution from perspective of foreign direct investment-a panel threshold analysis for Chinese provinces.
Shijie L; Hou D; Jin W; Shahid R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(41):58592-58605. PubMed ID: 34120282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO
Mert M; Bölük G; Çağlar AE
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jul; 26(21):21495-21510. PubMed ID: 31127517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO
Mert M; Bölük G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(21):21669-21681. PubMed ID: 27522202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of foreign direct investment on green innovation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese provinces.
Zhong S; Zhou Z; Jing H
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0298455. PubMed ID: 38354170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Environmental regulation, foreign direct investment, and export sophistication of China: an empirical study based on dynamic system GMM and threshold model.
Wang H; Yang M; He R; Zheng P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(48):72090-72100. PubMed ID: 34170470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. How does foreign direct investment improve urban air quality?
Li R; Shen Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(15):43665-43676. PubMed ID: 36662431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Environmental regulation and FDI attraction: a bibliometric analysis of the literature.
Santos A; Forte R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(7):8873-8888. PubMed ID: 33074432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Moderating role of institutional quality in validation of pollution haven hypothesis in BRICS: a new evidence by using DCCE approach.
Chaudhry IS; Yin W; Ali SA; Faheem M; Abbas Q; Farooq F; Ur Rahman S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(6):9193-9202. PubMed ID: 34494199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Environmental impacts of FDI: evidence from heterogeneous panel methods.
Arif U; Arif A; Khan FN
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(16):23639-23649. PubMed ID: 34813013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Corruption, Hidden Economy and Environmental Pollution: A Spatial Econometric Analysis Based on China's Provincial Panel Data.
Wang S; Yuan Y; Wang H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31405224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China's cities? A spatial econometric perspective.
Liu Q; Wang S; Zhang W; Zhan D; Li J
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():521-529. PubMed ID: 28923755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The environmental cost of FDI and spatial implications of CO2 emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Abbas SJ; Iqbal A; Hussain MM; Anwar A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(29):74441-74451. PubMed ID: 37209336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Have environmental regulations restrained FDI in China? New evidence from a panel threshold model.
Guo T; Zheng B; Kamal MA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):39733-39749. PubMed ID: 36602727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of foreign direct investment on sustainable development in China.
Ayamba EC; Haibo C; Abdul-Rahaman AR; Serwaa OE; Osei-Agyemang A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jul; 27(20):25625-25637. PubMed ID: 32356063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is there a trade-off between financing current account deficits and environmental deterioration in developing countries? An empirical investigation for the validity of the pollution haven hypothesis.
Bulut U; Ucler G; Aksoz-Yilmaz H; Basaran DN
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(37):56090-56097. PubMed ID: 35325385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan: an exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach.
Nadeem AM; Ali T; Khan MTI; Guo Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(13):15407-15425. PubMed ID: 32072420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries.
Balsalobre-Lorente D; Gokmenoglu KK; Taspinar N; Cantos-Cantos JM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(22):23010-23026. PubMed ID: 31183758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of foreign direct investment on environmental quality in West Africa.
Kindo M; Ouoba Y; Kabore FP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(20):57788-57800. PubMed ID: 36971942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. ICT, foreign direct investment and environmental pollution in major Asia Pacific countries.
Bhujabal P; Sethi N; Padhan PC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(31):42649-42669. PubMed ID: 33818724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do environmental regulations matter on Spanish foreign investment? A multisectorial approach.
Cansino JM; Carril-Cacia F; Molina-Parrado JC; Román-Collado R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(41):57781-57797. PubMed ID: 34100206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
