These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32899562)

  • 41. The impact of the spatial agglomeration of foreign direct investment on green total factor productivity of Chinese cities.
    Yu D; Li X; Yu J; Li H
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 290():112666. PubMed ID: 33910073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries.
    Apergis N; Pinar M; Unlu E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):14680-14692. PubMed ID: 36163571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of institutional quality in FDI inflows and carbon emission reduction: evidence from the global developing and belt road initiative countries.
    Khan H; Weili L; Khan I
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(20):30594-30621. PubMed ID: 35000154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of political risk environment in neighboring countries on FDI in host countries: the moderating role of green governance in neighboring countries.
    Gao R; Du X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(1):1488-1503. PubMed ID: 38040887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The two-sided effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions performance in China.
    Song W; Mao H; Han X
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 791():148331. PubMed ID: 34139496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Trade, FDI, and CO
    Mahmood H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):14439-14454. PubMed ID: 36152100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Economic growth, CO
    Bakhsh K; Rose S; Ali MF; Ahmad N; Shahbaz M
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():627-632. PubMed ID: 28364712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ecological implication of offshored economic activities in Turkey: foreign direct investment perspective.
    Udemba EN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(30):38015-38028. PubMed ID: 32617824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Can China's Environmental Regulations Effectively Reduce Pollution Emissions?
    Chen X; Chen Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33925668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spatial spillover effect of the synergistic development of inward and outward foreign direct investment on ecological well-being performance in China.
    Teng Y; Jin Y; Wen H; Ye X; Liu C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46547-46561. PubMed ID: 36719588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Environmental impact of foreign direct investment in Turkey: does the quality of institutions matter? Evidence from time series analysis using the Fourier extension.
    Mukiyen Avcı G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Oct; 30(49):107841-107853. PubMed ID: 37740807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Environmental Regulation Effect on Green Total Factor Productivity: Mediating Role of Foreign Direct Investment Quantity and Quality.
    Luo Y; Lu Z; Wu C; Mensah CN
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Role of foreign direct investment and fiscal decentralization on urban haze pollution in China.
    Wang F; He J; Niu Y
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 305():114287. PubMed ID: 34968936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An environmental assessment of the impacts of corruption, foreign investment inflow and trade liberalization in the rapidly emerging Malaysian Economy.
    Gyamfi BA; Onifade ST; Ridzuan AR; Shaari MS; Jena PK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(41):93667-93685. PubMed ID: 37507569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The impact of foreign direct investment on CO
    Koçak E; Şarkgüneşi A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(1):790-804. PubMed ID: 29063405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Does foreign direct investments impair the ecological footprint? New evidence from the panel quantile regression.
    Chowdhury MAF; Shanto PA; Ahmed A; Rumana RH
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(12):14372-14385. PubMed ID: 33210250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited.
    Bulus GC; Koc S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(28):38238-38253. PubMed ID: 33733418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulation on foreign direct investment: do environmental regulation affect FDI decisions?
    Fahad S; Bai D; Liu L; Baloch ZA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(4):5092-5104. PubMed ID: 34415522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does Chinese foreign direct investment harm CO2 emissions in the Belt and Road Economies.
    Shinwari R; Wang Y; Maghyereh A; Awartani B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(26):39528-39544. PubMed ID: 35103938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The impact of economic growth, FDI, and innovation on environmental efficiency of the logistics industry in provinces along the belt and road in China: An empirical study based on the panel Tobit model.
    Guo M; Li H; Lin W
    Sci Prog; 2021; 104(2):368504211018054. PubMed ID: 34003677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.