197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32899585)
1. Application of AULA Risk Assessment Tool by Comparison with Other Ergonomic Risk Assessment Tools.
Choi KH; Kim DM; Cho MU; Park CW; Kim SY; Kim MJ; Kong YK
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32899585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of ergonomic evaluation tools (ALLA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for farm work.
Kong YK; Lee SY; Lee KS; Kim DM
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Jun; 24(2):218-223. PubMed ID: 28301984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review.
Kee D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An empirical comparison of OWAS, RULA and REBA based on self-reported discomfort.
Kee D
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Jun; 26(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 31941428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ergonomic risk assessment of working postures of nurses working in a medical faculty hospital with REBA and RULA methods.
Ayvaz Ö; Özyıldırım BA; İşsever H; Öztan G; Atak M; Özel S
Sci Prog; 2023; 106(4):368504231216540. PubMed ID: 38018149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Working postures of dental students: ergonomic analysis using the Ovako Working Analysis System and rapid upper limb assessment.
Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia P; Polli GS; Campos JA
Med Lav; 2013; 104(6):440-7. PubMed ID: 24640831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Forestry: A Comparison between RULA and REBA in the Manual Feeding of a Wood-Chipper.
Micheletti Cremasco M; Giustetto A; Caffaro F; Colantoni A; Cavallo E; Grigolato S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30841494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction model of the effect of postural interactions on muscular activity and perceived exertion.
Hellig T; Johnen L; Mertens A; Nitsch V; Brandl C
Ergonomics; 2020 May; 63(5):593-606. PubMed ID: 32216547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ergonomic risk assessment of smartphone users using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool.
Namwongsa S; Puntumetakul R; Neubert MS; Chaiklieng S; Boucaut R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203394. PubMed ID: 30161266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-month work-related musculoskeletal disorders assessment during manual lymphatic drainage in physiotherapists using Generic Postures notion.
Gorce P; Jacquier-Bret J
J Occup Health; 2023; 65(1):e12420. PubMed ID: 37596728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ergonomic assessment of robotic general surgeons: a pilot study.
Dwyer A; Huckleby J; Kabbani M; Delano A; De Sutter M; Crawford D
J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):387-392. PubMed ID: 31302826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of an Ergonomics Checklist for Investigation of Work-Related Whole-Body Disorders in Farming - AWBA: Agricultural Whole-Body Assessment.
Kong YK; Lee SJ; Lee KS; Kim GR; Kim DM
J Agric Saf Health; 2015 Oct; 21(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 26710578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of three observational techniques for assessing postural loads in industry.
Kee D; Karwowski W
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2007; 13(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 17362654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. OWAS inter-rater reliability.
Lins C; Fudickar S; Hein A
Appl Ergon; 2021 May; 93():103357. PubMed ID: 33524664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of the rapid upper limb assessment tool to assess the level of ergonomic risk among health care professionals: A systematic review.
Kakaraparthi VN; Vishwanathan K; Gadhavi B; Reddy RS; Tedla JS; Samuel PS; Dixit S; Alshahrani MS; Gannamaneni VK
Work; 2022; 71(3):551-564. PubMed ID: 35253700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of musculoskeletal disorders in pepper cultivation workers.
Gómez-Galán M; Callejón-Ferre ÁJ; Díaz-Pérez M; Carreño-Ortega Á; López-Martínez A
EXCLI J; 2021; 20():1033-1054. PubMed ID: 34267615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is low-cost motion capture with artificial intelligence applicable for human working posture risk assessment during manual material handling? A pilot study.
Zhang R; Niu J; Ran L
Work; 2023; 74(1):283-293. PubMed ID: 36245349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in ergonomic and workstation factors between computer office workers with and without reported musculoskeletal pain.
Rodrigues MS; Leite RDV; Lelis CM; Chaves TC
Work; 2017; 57(4):563-572. PubMed ID: 28826196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. RGB-D ergonomic assessment system of adopted working postures.
Abobakr A; Nahavandi D; Hossny M; Iskander J; Attia M; Nahavandi S; Smets M
Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():75-88. PubMed ID: 31280813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do dental students have a neutral working posture?
Movahhed T; Dehghani M; Arghami S; Arghami A
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 29(4):859-864. PubMed ID: 27197705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]