BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32899585)

  • 1. Application of AULA Risk Assessment Tool by Comparison with Other Ergonomic Risk Assessment Tools.
    Choi KH; Kim DM; Cho MU; Park CW; Kim SY; Kim MJ; Kong YK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32899585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of ergonomic evaluation tools (ALLA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for farm work.
    Kong YK; Lee SY; Lee KS; Kim DM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Jun; 24(2):218-223. PubMed ID: 28301984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review.
    Kee D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An empirical comparison of OWAS, RULA and REBA based on self-reported discomfort.
    Kee D
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Jun; 26(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 31941428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ergonomic risk assessment of working postures of nurses working in a medical faculty hospital with REBA and RULA methods.
    Ayvaz Ö; Özyıldırım BA; İşsever H; Öztan G; Atak M; Özel S
    Sci Prog; 2023; 106(4):368504231216540. PubMed ID: 38018149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working postures of dental students: ergonomic analysis using the Ovako Working Analysis System and rapid upper limb assessment.
    Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia P; Polli GS; Campos JA
    Med Lav; 2013; 104(6):440-7. PubMed ID: 24640831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Forestry: A Comparison between RULA and REBA in the Manual Feeding of a Wood-Chipper.
    Micheletti Cremasco M; Giustetto A; Caffaro F; Colantoni A; Cavallo E; Grigolato S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30841494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction model of the effect of postural interactions on muscular activity and perceived exertion.
    Hellig T; Johnen L; Mertens A; Nitsch V; Brandl C
    Ergonomics; 2020 May; 63(5):593-606. PubMed ID: 32216547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ergonomic risk assessment of smartphone users using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool.
    Namwongsa S; Puntumetakul R; Neubert MS; Chaiklieng S; Boucaut R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203394. PubMed ID: 30161266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-month work-related musculoskeletal disorders assessment during manual lymphatic drainage in physiotherapists using Generic Postures notion.
    Gorce P; Jacquier-Bret J
    J Occup Health; 2023; 65(1):e12420. PubMed ID: 37596728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ergonomic assessment of robotic general surgeons: a pilot study.
    Dwyer A; Huckleby J; Kabbani M; Delano A; De Sutter M; Crawford D
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):387-392. PubMed ID: 31302826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an Ergonomics Checklist for Investigation of Work-Related Whole-Body Disorders in Farming - AWBA: Agricultural Whole-Body Assessment.
    Kong YK; Lee SJ; Lee KS; Kim GR; Kim DM
    J Agric Saf Health; 2015 Oct; 21(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 26710578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of three observational techniques for assessing postural loads in industry.
    Kee D; Karwowski W
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2007; 13(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 17362654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. OWAS inter-rater reliability.
    Lins C; Fudickar S; Hein A
    Appl Ergon; 2021 May; 93():103357. PubMed ID: 33524664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the rapid upper limb assessment tool to assess the level of ergonomic risk among health care professionals: A systematic review.
    Kakaraparthi VN; Vishwanathan K; Gadhavi B; Reddy RS; Tedla JS; Samuel PS; Dixit S; Alshahrani MS; Gannamaneni VK
    Work; 2022; 71(3):551-564. PubMed ID: 35253700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of musculoskeletal disorders in pepper cultivation workers.
    Gómez-Galán M; Callejón-Ferre ÁJ; Díaz-Pérez M; Carreño-Ortega Á; López-Martínez A
    EXCLI J; 2021; 20():1033-1054. PubMed ID: 34267615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is low-cost motion capture with artificial intelligence applicable for human working posture risk assessment during manual material handling? A pilot study.
    Zhang R; Niu J; Ran L
    Work; 2023; 74(1):283-293. PubMed ID: 36245349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in ergonomic and workstation factors between computer office workers with and without reported musculoskeletal pain.
    Rodrigues MS; Leite RDV; Lelis CM; Chaves TC
    Work; 2017; 57(4):563-572. PubMed ID: 28826196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RGB-D ergonomic assessment system of adopted working postures.
    Abobakr A; Nahavandi D; Hossny M; Iskander J; Attia M; Nahavandi S; Smets M
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():75-88. PubMed ID: 31280813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do dental students have a neutral working posture?
    Movahhed T; Dehghani M; Arghami S; Arghami A
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 29(4):859-864. PubMed ID: 27197705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.