These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32900312)
1. Prey with hidden colour defences benefit from their similarity to aposematic signals. Kim Y; Hwang Y; Bae S; Sherratt TN; An J; Choi SW; Miller JC; Kang C Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Sep; 287(1934):20201894. PubMed ID: 32900312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Body size affects the evolution of hidden colour signals in moths. Kang C; Zahiri R; Sherratt TN Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Aug; 284(1861):. PubMed ID: 28855366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The protective value of a defensive display varies with the experience of wild predators. Umbers KDL; White TE; De Bona S; Haff T; Ryeland J; Drinkwater E; Mappes J Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):463. PubMed ID: 30679660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deimatic display in the European swallowtail butterfly as a secondary defence against attacks from great tits. Olofsson M; Eriksson S; Jakobsson S; Wiklund C PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47092. PubMed ID: 23056590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The anti-predation benefit of flash displays is related to the distance at which the prey initiates its escape. Loeffler-Henry K; Kang C; Sherratt TN Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1955):20210866. PubMed ID: 34315261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consistent Associations between Body Size and Hidden Contrasting Color Signals across a Range of Insect Taxa. Loeffler-Henry K; Kang C; Sherratt TN Am Nat; 2019 Jul; 194(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 31251647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evolution of startle displays: a case study in praying mantises. Vidal-García M; O'Hanlon JC; Svenson GJ; Umbers KDL Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Sep; 287(1934):20201016. PubMed ID: 32873210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey. Hämäläinen L; Mappes J; Rowland HM; Teichmann M; Thorogood R J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 32077104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals. Endler JA; Mappes J Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The protective value of the colour and shape of the mountain katydid's antipredator defence. Riley JL; Haff TM; Ryeland J; Drinkwater E; Umbers KDL J Evol Biol; 2023 Jul; 36(7):992-1002. PubMed ID: 35960499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey. Thorogood R; Kokko H; Mappes J Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb; 2(2):254-261. PubMed ID: 29255302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey. Skelhorn J; Rowe C Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the feasibility of the startle-first route to deimatism. Holmes GG; Delferrière E; Rowe C; Troscianko J; Skelhorn J Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):10737. PubMed ID: 30013124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights. Puurtinen M; Kaitala V Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multimodal warning signals for a multiple predator world. Ratcliffe JM; Nydam ML Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7209):96-9. PubMed ID: 18769439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]