These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32901245)

  • 21. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension.
    Peelle JE; Gross J; Davis MH
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1378-87. PubMed ID: 22610394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Listeners Experience Linguistic Masking Release in Noise-Vocoded Speech-in-Speech Recognition.
    Viswanathan N; Kokkinakis K; Williams BT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Feb; 61(2):428-435. PubMed ID: 29396580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neural speech tracking shifts from the syllabic to the modulation rate of speech as intelligibility decreases.
    Schmidt F; Chen YP; Keitel A; Rösch S; Hannemann R; Serman M; Hauswald A; Weisz N
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Nov; 60(11):e14362. PubMed ID: 37350379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dissociating prosodic from syntactic delta activity during natural speech comprehension.
    Chalas N; Meyer L; Lo CW; Park H; Kluger DS; Abbasi O; Kayser C; Nitsch R; Gross J
    Curr Biol; 2024 Aug; 34(15):3537-3549.e5. PubMed ID: 39047734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of selective attention and speech acoustics on neural speech-tracking in a multi-talker scene.
    Rimmele JM; Zion Golumbic E; Schröger E; Poeppel D
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():144-54. PubMed ID: 25650107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech--a positron emission tomography study.
    Scott SK; Rosen S; Lang H; Wise RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):1075-83. PubMed ID: 16938993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Previous exposure to intact speech increases intelligibility of its digitally degraded counterpart as a function of stimulus complexity.
    Hakonen M; May PJC; Alho J; Alku P; Jokinen E; Jääskeläinen IP; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():131-143. PubMed ID: 26477651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3114-25. PubMed ID: 21110607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sleep Disrupts High-Level Speech Parsing Despite Significant Basic Auditory Processing.
    Makov S; Sharon O; Ding N; Ben-Shachar M; Nir Y; Zion Golumbic E
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7772-7781. PubMed ID: 28626013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: behavioural and neural interactions.
    McGettigan C; Faulkner A; Altarelli I; Obleser J; Baverstock H; Scott SK
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):762-76. PubMed ID: 22266262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech.
    Ding N; Melloni L; Zhang H; Tian X; Poeppel D
    Nat Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 19(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 26642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural Decoding of the Speech Envelope: Effects of Intelligibility and Spectral Degradation.
    MacIntyre AD; Carlyon RP; Goehring T
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241266316. PubMed ID: 39183533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a cocktail party.
    Har-Shai Yahav P; Zion Golumbic E
    Elife; 2021 May; 10():. PubMed ID: 33942722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EEG oscillations entrain their phase to high-level features of speech sound.
    Zoefel B; VanRullen R
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):16-23. PubMed ID: 26341026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression on the intelligibility of vocoded sentences for a tonal language.
    Chen F; Zheng D; Tsao Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1157. PubMed ID: 28964090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.