174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32901456)
1. Survival Rates of Breast Cancer Patients Aged 40 to 49 Years according to Detection Modality in Korea: Screening Ultrasound versus Mammography.
Won SY; Park HS; Kim EK; Kim SI; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY; Park S; Kim MJ; Cho YU; Park BW
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 22(2):159-167. PubMed ID: 32901456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast Cancer Detected at Screening US: Survival Rates and Clinical-Pathologic and Imaging Factors Associated with Recurrence.
Kim SY; Han BK; Kim EK; Choi WJ; Choi Y; Kim HH; Moon WK
Radiology; 2017 Aug; 284(2):354-364. PubMed ID: 28387638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods.
Joensuu H; Lehtimäki T; Holli K; Elomaa L; Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T; Kataja V; Anttila A; Lundin M; Isola J; Lundin J
JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(9):1064-73. PubMed ID: 15339900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival and Disease-Free Survival by Breast Density and Phenotype in Interval Breast Cancers.
Sala M; Domingo L; Louro J; Torá-Rocamora I; Baré M; Ferrer J; Carmona-Garcia MC; Barata T; Román M; Macià F; Castells X;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Aug; 27(8):908-916. PubMed ID: 29853482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: Comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Yi A; Koo HR; Han BK
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):969-76. PubMed ID: 20942730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials.
Shen Y; Yang Y; Inoue LY; Munsell MF; Miller AB; Berry DA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Aug; 97(16):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16106024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms.
Bae MS; Han W; Koo HR; Cho N; Chang JM; Yi A; Park IA; Noh DY; Choi WS; Moon WK
Cancer Sci; 2011 Oct; 102(10):1862-7. PubMed ID: 21752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glandular Tissue Component and Breast Cancer Risk in Mammographically Dense Breasts at Screening Breast US.
Lee SH; Ryu HS; Jang MJ; Yi A; Ha SM; Kim SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2021 Oct; 301(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 34282967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the mode of detection on outcome in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Kini VR; Vicini FA; Victor SJ; Dmuchowski CF; Rebner M; Martinez AA
Am J Clin Oncol; 1999 Oct; 22(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 10521052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ According to Detection Modality: A Multicenter Study Comparing Recurrence Between Mammography and Breast US.
Yoon JH; Han K; Koh J; Kim GR; Kim HJ; Park YM; Youk JH; Chung J; Chae IH; Choi EJ; Moon HJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 45(10):2623-2633. PubMed ID: 31351671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts.
Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Chung SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Han W; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25458226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Better Overall Survival for Breast Cancer Patients by Adding Breast Ultrasound to Follow-Up Examinations for Early Detection of Locoregional Recurrence-A Survival Impact Study.
Tsai WC; Wei HK; Hung CF; Kwang-Jane Lin C; Hung-Chun Cheng S; Chen CM; Wang YA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2058-64. PubMed ID: 27184247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Cancer Yields and Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography vs. Supplemental Screening Ultrasound in 4394 Women with Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
Moon HJ; Jung I; Park SJ; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kim EK
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Jun; 36(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 24764212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
