BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32902123)

  • 1. Are <7-mm long implants in native bone as effective as longer implants in augmented bone for the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic jaws? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Iezzi G; Perrotti V; Felice P; Barausse C; Piattelli A; Del Fabbro M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 22(5):552-566. PubMed ID: 32902123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up.
    Esposito M; Buti J; Barausse C; Gasparro R; Sammartino G; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 31535097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Piattelli M; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 29806665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6-mm-long 4-mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year post-loading results from a within-person randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Piattelli M; Buti J; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 31116188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31116186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing 4-mm dental implants to longer implants placed in augmented bones in the atrophic posterior mandibles: One-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Rokn AR; Monzavi A; Panjnoush M; Hashemi HM; Kharazifard MJ; Bitaraf T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 20(6):997-1002. PubMed ID: 30307129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior jaws rehabilitation with < 7mm-short implants. A review.
    Lizio G; Pellegrino G; Felice P
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 123(3):e45-e56. PubMed ID: 34563727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (≥10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Chen S; Ou Q; Wang Y; Lin X
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1192-1203. PubMed ID: 31295755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 5-year randomized controlled clinical trial comparing 4-mm ultrashort to longer implants placed in regenerated bone in the posterior atrophic jaw.
    Barausse C; Pistilli R; Canullo L; Bonifazi L; Ferri A; Felice P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Feb; 24(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 35019219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bitaraf T; Keshtkar A; Rokn AR; Monzavi A; Geramy A; Hashemi K
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):796-812. PubMed ID: 31044538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss.
    Anitua E; Piñas L; Orive G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 23656303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation.
    Yu X; Xu R; Zhang Z; Yang Y; Deng F
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8152. PubMed ID: 33854095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate Loading of Fixed Partial Dental Prostheses on Extra-Short and Short Implants in Patients with Severe Atrophy of the Posterior Maxilla or Mandible: An Up-to-4-year Clinical Study.
    Amato F; Polara G; Spedicato GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):607-615. PubMed ID: 32406660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are short implants (≤8.5 mm) reliable in the rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liang L; Wu X; Yan Q; Shi B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):826-832. PubMed ID: 35469646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Prosthesis Design on the Outcomes of Tooth Implants Immediately Placed and Loaded by Means of One-Piece Titanium Machined Restoration.
    Toti P; Marconcini S; Enrica G; Pedretti G; Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Apr; 44(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 29182488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Pieri F; Caselli E; Forlivesi C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 27632276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short implants versus bone augmentation in combination with standard-length implants in posterior atrophic partially edentulous mandibles: systematic review and meta-analysis with the Bayesian approach.
    de N Dias FJ; Pecorari VGA; Martins CB; Del Fabbro M; Casati MZ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 29843950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.
    Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: Systematic review.
    Amine M; Guelzim Y; Benfaida S; Bennani A; Andoh A
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 120(2):133-142. PubMed ID: 30472460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.