These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32902765)

  • 1. Optimizing the robotic surgery team: an operations management perspective.
    Harmanli O; Solak S; Bayram A; Yuksel B; Jones K
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1379-1385. PubMed ID: 32902765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sacrocolpopexy experience with a novel robotic surgical platform.
    Sassani JC; Glass Clark S; McGough CE; Shepherd JP; Bonidie M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3255-3260. PubMed ID: 35312804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1317-1323. PubMed ID: 28889173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of a Dedicated Robotic Team on Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 28430728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms.
    Glass Clark S; Shepherd JP; Sassani JC; Bonidie M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 36282303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
    Paraiso MF
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and tips.
    Griebel L; Misal M; Cornella J; Khan A; Wolter C; Yi J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2905. PubMed ID: 35333928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F
    Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic and robotic sacropexy: retrospective review of learning curve experiences and follow-up.
    Pilka R; Gágyor D; Študentová M; Neubert D; Dzvinčuk P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28925269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study.
    van Zanten F; Brem C; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):905-912. PubMed ID: 29687171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.