These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32902765)

  • 21. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 26249235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.
    Chan SS; Pang SM; Cheung TH; Cheung RY; Chung TK
    Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Feb; 17(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21282827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform.
    Ganesan V; Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Carmel M
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):753-758. PubMed ID: 32036495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective.
    Burgess KL; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Jallad K; Barber MD; Ridgeway B; Paraiso MF; Unger CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1535-9. PubMed ID: 27026142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy.
    Thomas TN; Davidson ERW; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 32253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blinded measure of Trendelenburg angle in pelvic robotic surgery.
    Gould C; Cull T; Wu YX; Osmundsen B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):465-8. PubMed ID: 22621993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Nguyen JN; Yang ST
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 31332703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy.
    Lee W; Tam J; Kobashi K
    Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 30466696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pelvic organ prolapse after 3 modes of hysterectomy: long-term follow-up.
    Gabriel I; Kalousdian A; Brito LG; Abdalian T; Vitonis AF; Minassian VA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):496.e1-496.e10. PubMed ID: 33207236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Myers EM; Siff L; Osmundsen B; Geller E; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Apr; 26(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 25366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic supracervical hysterectomy and colpo-procto-sacropexy with folded titanized polypropylene mesh for multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse - a video-vignette.
    Zigiotto D; Sturiale A; Fabiani B; Fralleone L; Simoncini T; Naldini G
    Colorectal Dis; 2021 Oct; 23(10):2783. PubMed ID: 34260127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery.
    Ghomi A; Kramer C; Askari R; Chavan NR; Einarsson JI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22748954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution].
    Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L
    Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Alas AN; Anger JT
    Curr Urol Rep; 2015 May; 16(5):33. PubMed ID: 25874589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.