231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32902766)
1. Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.
Koc Vural U; Kerimova L; Kiremitci A
Odontology; 2021 Apr; 109(2):376-384. PubMed ID: 32902766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term clinical comparison of a resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions.
Koç-Vural U; Kerimova-Köse L; Kiremitci A
Odontology; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38837034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
Gonçalves DFM; Shinohara MS; Carvalho PRMA; Ramos FSES; Oliveira LC; Omoto ÉM; Fagundes TC
J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 29():e20210192. PubMed ID: 34705986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
Santiago SL; Passos VF; Vieira AH; Navarro MF; Lauris JR; Franco EB
Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21203706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of cavity lining on the restoration of root surface carious lesions: a split-mouth, 5-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
Koc Vural U; Gokalp S; Kiremitci A
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):979-989. PubMed ID: 31273529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of posterior composite restorations lined with ion-releasing materials.
Ahmed B; Wafaie RA; Hamama HH; Mahmoud SH
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4942. PubMed ID: 38418863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Performance of Composite Restorations with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Lining in Root Surface Carious Lesions.
Koc Vural U; Gökalp S; Kiremitci A
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 26794189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-step Self-etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An 18-Month Clinical Trial.
Jassal M; Mittal S; Tewari S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 29782222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparison of different glass ionomer-based restoratives and a bulk-fill resin composite in Class I cavities: A 48-month randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
Bayazıt EÖ; Başeren M; Meral E
J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104473. PubMed ID: 36863696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.
Hatirli H; Yasa B; Çelik EU
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of New Alkasite Based Restorative Material for Restoring Non- Carious Cervical Lesions- Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Ballal NV; Jalan P; Rai N; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2023 Feb; 31(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 35659319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-year evaluation of a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases: a randomized, clinical trial.
Oz FD; Meral E; Ergİn E; Gurgan S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20200311. PubMed ID: 33111883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Uyumaz FÜ; Abaklı İnci M; Özer H
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):702-709. PubMed ID: 38108583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
