BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32903313)

  • 21. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Multi-institution Study and a Review of the Literature.
    Corrado G; Vizza E; Legge F; Pedone Anchora L; Sperduti I; Fagotti A; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Zampa A; Chiofalo B; Scambia G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):1020-1028. PubMed ID: 29727351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study.
    Li Z; Duan H; Guo J; Yang Y; Wang W; Hao M; Li W; Li P; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):122. PubMed ID: 35282078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Results in Higher Recurrence Rate Versus Open Abdominal Surgery for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients With Tumor Size Less Than 2 Centimeter: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Chen X; Yu J; Zhao H; Hu Y; Zhu H
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():683231. PubMed ID: 34178675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Hysterectomy Versus Definitive Chemoradiation for FIGO Stage IIB Cervical Cancer.
    Tomita N; Mizuno M; Makita C; Kondo S; Mori M; Sakata J; Tsubouchi H; Hirata K; Tachibana H; Kodaira T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Oct; 28(8):1576-1583. PubMed ID: 30095702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impacts of minimally invasive surgery on intermediate- or high-risk cervical cancer patients received adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Zhang Q; Liu Z; Wang Y; Zhang J; Li W; Wang T; Wang J; Shi F; Su J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Nov; 20(1):372. PubMed ID: 36443879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Radical Surgery and Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wang H; Ni C; Xiao W; Yang T; Sun W
    Oncol Res Treat; 2021; 44(4):176-183. PubMed ID: 33706315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
    Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Robledo KP; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Ribeiro R; Lopez A; Yan X; Isla D; Moretti R; Bernardini MQ; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    J Clin Oncol; 2024 May; ():JCO2302335. PubMed ID: 38810208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI
    Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
    Melamed A; Ramirez PT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identifying selection criteria for non-radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer.
    Kasamatsu T; Ishikawa M; Murakami N; Okada S; Ikeda SI; Kato T; Itami J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):882-891. PubMed ID: 30672089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Abdominal Surgery Among Patients With Cervical Cancer.
    Ratiu D; Luncescu C; Morgenstern B; Eichler C; Grüttner B; Ludwig S; Mallmann P; Thangarajah F
    Anticancer Res; 2019 May; 39(5):2661-2664. PubMed ID: 31092465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
    Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study.
    Alfonzo E; Wallin E; Ekdahl L; Staf C; Rådestad AF; Reynisson P; Stålberg K; Falconer H; Persson J; Dahm-Kähler P
    Eur J Cancer; 2019 Jul; 116():169-177. PubMed ID: 31200323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.
    Liu CH; Lee YC; Lin JC; Chan IS; Lee NR; Chang WH; Liu WM; Wang PH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31614465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage.
    Balaya V; Guani B; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F; On Behalf Of The Senticol Group
    Cancers (Basel); 2020 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 33260758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical tumor diameter and prognosis of patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer (JCOG0806-A).
    Kato T; Takashima A; Kasamatsu T; Nakamura K; Mizusawa J; Nakanishi T; Takeshima N; Kamiura S; Onda T; Sumi T; Takano M; Nakai H; Saito T; Fujiwara K; Yokoyama M; Itamochi H; Takehara K; Yokota H; Mizunoe T; Takeda S; Sonoda K; Shiozawa T; Kawabata T; Honma S; Fukuda H; Yaegashi N; Yoshikawa H; Konishi I; Kamura T;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 137(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25662625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survival Outcomes in Patients With 2018 FIGO Stage IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic
    Zhao W; Xiao Y; Zhao W; Yang Q; Bi F
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():682849. PubMed ID: 34222001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.