These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32903313)

  • 41. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mini-invasive
    Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Surgery in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Dinoi G; Ghoniem K; Murad MH; Segarra-Vidal B; Zanfagnin V; Coronado PJ; Kyrgiou M; Perrone AM; Zola P; Weaver A; McGree M; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Ramirez PT; Mariani A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 141(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 36701610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Surgeon's Proficiency Affected Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 851 Patients.
    Yang Y; Huang Y; Li Z
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():787198. PubMed ID: 34869044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
    Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
    Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Outcomes of Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma, with or without Prior Cervical Excision Procedure.
    Nasioudis D; Labban N; Gysler S; Ko EM; Giuntoli RL; Kim SH; Latif NA
    Cancers (Basel); 2024 May; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 38893170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018).
    Chen X; Liang W; Duan H; Wu M; Zhan X; Dai E; Lv Q; Xie Q; Liu R; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():800049. PubMed ID: 35494051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.
    Li Z; Yang Q; Guo J; Liang G; Duan H; Wang S; Hao M; Liang W; Li D; Zhan X; Xie Q; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():933755. PubMed ID: 35875125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopic, abdominal and gasless laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: trial protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAGCC trial).
    Tang X; Zhou S; Zhang X; Hua K; He Y; Wang P; Teng Y; Feng W
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1287697. PubMed ID: 38023150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
    Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Definite chemoradiotherapy is a competent treatment option in FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer compared with radical surgery +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Hsieh HY; Huang JW; Lu CH; Lin JC; Wang L
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2019 Jan; 118(1 Pt 1):99-108. PubMed ID: 29429800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: A population-based study of long-term survival.
    Tseng JH; Aloisi A; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 29776598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Risk model in stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer with positive node after radical hysterectomy.
    Chen Z; Huang K; Lu Z; Deng S; Xiong J; Huang J; Li X; Tang F; Wang Z; Sun H; Wang L; Zhou S; Wang X; Jia Y; Hu T; Gui J; Wan D; Ma D; Li S; Wang S
    Onco Targets Ther; 2016; 9():3171-9. PubMed ID: 27313462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparative analysis of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of their long-term oncological outcomes: a meta-analysis of 3410 gastric cancer patients.
    Liao G; Zhao Z; Khan M; Yuan Y; Li X
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 17(1):86. PubMed ID: 31122260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
    Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
    Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.