These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32903415)

  • 1. Management of Genetic Diversity in the Era of Genomics.
    Meuwissen THE; Sonesson AK; Gebregiwergis G; Woolliams JA
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():880. PubMed ID: 32903415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in genome-wide and region-specific genetic diversity in the Dutch-Flemish Holstein-Friesian breeding program from 1986 to 2015.
    Doekes HP; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Hiemstra SJ; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):15. PubMed ID: 29642838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.
    Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Su G; Nielsen HM; Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):39. PubMed ID: 31286868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
    Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symposium review: The genomic architecture of inbreeding: How homozygosity affects health and performance.
    Baes CF; Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Marras G; Howard JT; Fleming A; Maltecca C
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2807-2817. PubMed ID: 30660425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of genomic regions associated with inbreeding depression in Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle.
    Pryce JE; Haile-Mariam M; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Nov; 46(1):71. PubMed ID: 25407532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of reduced genomic representation on using runs of homozygosity for inbreeding characterization.
    Lavanchy E; Goudet J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):787-802. PubMed ID: 36626297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inbreeding depression in line 1 Hereford cattle population using pedigree and genomic information.
    Sumreddee P; Toghiani S; Hay EH; Roberts A; Agrrey SE; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 30304409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic diversity analysis of two commercial breeds of pigs using genomic and pedigree data.
    Zanella R; Peixoto JO; Cardoso FF; Cardoso LL; Biegelmeyer P; Cantão ME; Otaviano A; Freitas MS; Caetano AR; Ledur MC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():24. PubMed ID: 27029213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic mating as sustainable breeding for Chinese indigenous Ningxiang pigs.
    He J; Wu XL; Zeng Q; Li H; Ma H; Jiang J; Rosa GJM; Gianola D; Tait RG; Bauck S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236629. PubMed ID: 32797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the estimation of inbreeding depression using different measures of inbreeding from molecular markers.
    Caballero A; Villanueva B; Druet T
    Evol Appl; 2021 Feb; 14(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 33664785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of inbreeding measures using a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.
    Alemu SW; Kadri NK; Harland C; Faux P; Charlier C; Caballero A; Druet T
    Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Mar; 126(3):410-423. PubMed ID: 33159183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Symposium review: Exploiting homozygosity in the era of genomics-Selection, inbreeding, and mating programs.
    Maltecca C; Tiezzi F; Cole JB; Baes C
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5302-5313. PubMed ID: 32331889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential bias in inbreeding depression estimates when using pedigree relationships to assess the degree of homozygosity for loci under selection.
    Groen AF; Kennedy BW; Eissen JJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 1995 Sep; 91(4):665-71. PubMed ID: 24169896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic gain and inbreeding from simulation of different genomic mating schemes for pig improvement.
    Zhao F; Zhang P; Wang X; Akdemir D; Garrick D; He J; Wang L
    J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2023 Jun; 14(1):87. PubMed ID: 37309010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling Coancestry and Thereby Future Inbreeding by Optimum-Contribution Selection Using Alternative Genomic-Relationship Matrices.
    Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC; Henryon M; Meuwissen T
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():345. PubMed ID: 32425971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing genomic diversity and signatures of selection in Original Braunvieh cattle using whole-genome sequencing data.
    Bhati M; Kadri NK; Crysnanto D; Pausch H
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):27. PubMed ID: 31914939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.