These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32903503)

  • 1. Evaluation of Four Commercial Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Approved by Emergency-Use-Authorization in Korea.
    Hur KH; Park K; Lim Y; Jeong YS; Sung H; Kim MN
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2020; 7():521. PubMed ID: 32903503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Three Multiplex Real-time Reverse Transcription PCR Assays for Simultaneous Detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A/B, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Nasopharyngeal Swabs.
    Yun J; Park JH; Kim N; Roh EY; Shin S; Yoon JH; Kim TS; Park H
    J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Dec; 36(48):e328. PubMed ID: 34904407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of "AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex RT-PCR kit (Bioneer, South Korea)" and "Allplex 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene, South Korea)" for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Diagnosis: Korean CDC EUA as a Quality Control Proxy for Developing Countries.
    Freire-Paspuel B; Garcia-Bereguiain MA
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2021; 11():630552. PubMed ID: 34178716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analytical and Clinical Validation of Six Commercial Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus RNA Detection Kits Based on Real-Time Reverse-Transcription PCR.
    Kim MN; Ko YJ; Seong MW; Kim JS; Shin BM; Sung H
    Ann Lab Med; 2016 Sep; 36(5):450-6. PubMed ID: 27374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance Evaluation of the PowerChek MERS (upE & ORF1a) Real-Time PCR Kit for the Detection of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus RNA.
    Huh HJ; Kim JY; Kwon HJ; Yun SA; Lee MK; Ki CS; Lee NY; Kim JW
    Ann Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 37(6):494-498. PubMed ID: 28840986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and Evaluation of AccuPower COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples.
    Suh IB; Lim J; Kim HS; Rhim G; Kim H; Kim H; Lee SM; Park HS; Song HJ; Hong M; Shin GS; Kim MJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263341. PubMed ID: 35143538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Kaira COVID-19/Flu/RSV Detection Kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus: A comparative study with the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2, influenza A&B, RSV Multiplex Real-time PCR Kit.
    Kim TY; Bae GE; Kim JY; Kang M; Jang JH; Huh HJ; Chung DR; Lee NY
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278530. PubMed ID: 36516190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of seven commercial RT-PCR kits for COVID-19 testing in pooled clinical specimens.
    Garg A; Ghoshal U; Patel SS; Singh DV; Arya AK; Vasanth S; Pandey A; Srivastava N
    J Med Virol; 2021 Apr; 93(4):2281-2286. PubMed ID: 33230819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative performances of seven quantitative Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction assays (RT-qPCR) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in samples from individuals suspected of COVID-19 in São Paulo, Brazil.
    Fukasawa LO; Sacchi CT; Gonçalves MG; Lemos APS; Almeida SCG; Caterino-de-Araujo A
    J Clin Virol Plus; 2021 Jun; 1(1):100012. PubMed ID: 35262000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Evaluation of the Rapid STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Screening of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.
    Kim HW; Park M; Lee JH
    Ann Lab Med; 2022 Jan; 42(1):100-104. PubMed ID: 34374355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance Evaluation of the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A & B Multiplex Real-Time PCR Kit in Comparison with the BioFire Respiratory Panel.
    Kim TY; Kim JY; Shim HJ; Yun SA; Jang JH; Huh HJ; Kim JW; Lee NY
    Ann Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 42(4):473-477. PubMed ID: 35177568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three molecular diagnostic assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection: Evaluation of analytical sensitivity and clinical performance.
    Kim HN; Yoon SY; Lim CS; Yoon J
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2022 Feb; 36(2):e24242. PubMed ID: 35019184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the clinical and analytical performance of three Seegene Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assays within the VALCOR framework.
    Chung PYJ; Dhillon SK; Simoens C; Cuypers L; Laenen L; Bonde J; Corbisier P; Buttinger G; Cocuzza CE; Van Gucht S; Van Ranst M; Arbyn M
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):e0239723. PubMed ID: 38189291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the AdvanSure One-Stop COVID-19 Plus Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection Using a Streamlined RNA Extraction Method.
    Kim TY; Shim HJ; Jeong E; Kang M; Jang JH; Huh HJ; Lee NY
    Ann Lab Med; 2023 Sep; 43(5):508-511. PubMed ID: 37080753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Evaluation of Three Commercial RT-PCR Kits for Routine COVID-19 Diagnosis.
    Juthi RT; Sazed SA; Zamil MF; Alam MS
    Pathogens; 2022 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 36422640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, and 3 for Detection of Respiratory Viruses and Influenza A Virus Subtypes.
    Huh HJ; Kim JY; Kwon HJ; Yun SA; Lee MK; Lee NY; Kim JW; Ki CS
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 55(2):479-484. PubMed ID: 27903601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of seven commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19.
    van Kasteren PB; van der Veer B; van den Brink S; Wijsman L; de Jonge J; van den Brandt A; Molenkamp R; Reusken CBEM; Meijer A
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Jul; 128():104412. PubMed ID: 32416600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance verification of five commercial RT-qPCR diagnostic kits for SARS-CoV-2.
    Yang M; Cao S; Liu Y; Zhang Z; Zheng R; Li Y; Zhou J; Zong C; Cao D; Qin X
    Clin Chim Acta; 2022 Jan; 525():46-53. PubMed ID: 34902345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of real-time RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Republic of Korea.
    Chung YS; Lee NJ; Woo SH; Kim JM; Kim HM; Jo HJ; Park YE; Han MG
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14817. PubMed ID: 34285290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic evaluation of nCoV-QS, nCoV-QM-N, and nCoV-OM detection kits based on rRT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Ecuador.
    Salinas M; Aguirre D; Baldeón L; Pérez-Galarza J
    Heliyon; 2022 Oct; 8(10):e11137. PubMed ID: 36278117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.