These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Automatic dental arch detection and panoramic image synthesis from CT images. Sa-Ing V; Wangkaoom K; Thongvigitmanee SS Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6099-102. PubMed ID: 24111131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic reconstruction method for high-contrast panoramic image from dental cone-beam CT data. Yun Z; Yang S; Huang E; Zhao L; Yang W; Feng Q Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():205-214. PubMed ID: 31104708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Oral panorama reconstruction method based on pre-segmentation and Bezier function]. Hou C; Zhu F; Zhang G; Lyu Z; Liu Y; Zhu W Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 40(5):894-902. PubMed ID: 37879918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Research on panoramic image reconstruction based on oral cone beam computed tomography]. Zhang J; Jiang Y; Gao F; Zhao S; Song L Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 39(5):870-875. PubMed ID: 36310475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic Synthesis of Panoramic Radiographs from Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography Data. Luo T; Shi C; Zhao X; Zhao Y; Xu J PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156976. PubMed ID: 27300554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion of lower gingival carcinoma: comparison with conventional panoramic radiography. Momin MA; Okochi K; Watanabe H; Imaizumi A; Omura K; Amagasa T; Okada N; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 18653297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Tantanapornkul W; Okouchi K; Fujiwara Y; Yamashiro M; Maruoka Y; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 17234544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A method for generating dental panoramic radiographs from 3D CT sectional data]. Zhu J; Wang L; Wang W; Huang Y; Guo H Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 28(6):1189-93, 1226. PubMed ID: 22295712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semi-automatic and robust determination of dental arch form in dental cone-beam CT with B-spline approximation. Bae M; Park JW; Kim N Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Apr; 172():95-101. PubMed ID: 30902131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D reconstruction based on compressed-sensing (CS)-based framework by using a dental panoramic detector. Je UK; Cho HM; Hong DK; Cho HS; Park YO; Park CK; Kim KS; Lim HW; Kim GA; Park SY; Woo TH; Cho SI Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):213-7. PubMed ID: 26494155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. Garg AK; Vicari A Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images. Wolff C; Mücke T; Wagenpfeil S; Kanatas A; Bissinger O; Deppe H J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1700-1705. PubMed ID: 27567358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study. Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of three-dimensional X-ray images: reconstruction from conventional tomograms, compact computerized tomography images, and multislice helical computerized tomography images. Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Kubota Y; Ariji E J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):234-41. PubMed ID: 16265853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]