351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32906125)
1. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes.
Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T
Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y
J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Disposable Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare ic100, and Tonopen XL to Standards of Care Goldmann Nondisposable Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure.
Wong B; Parikh D; Rosen L; Gorski M; Angelilli A; Shih C
J Glaucoma; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1119-1124. PubMed ID: 30134367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness.
Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A
Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.
Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Salim S; Du H; Wan J
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Perkins Applanation Tonometer in Community Eye Screening.
Ting SL; Lim LT; Ooi CY; Rahman MM
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 31165604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification.
Kiddee W; Tanjana A
J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):317-324. PubMed ID: 33137014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Evaluation of the New Rebound Tonometers Icare PRO and Icare ONE Compared With the Goldmann Tonometer.
Moreno-Montañés J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Sabater AL; Morales-Fernandez L; Sáenz C; Garcia-Feijoo J
J Glaucoma; 2015 Sep; 24(7):527-32. PubMed ID: 24844537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
